ASIC: TH 1320, noisy pixel masekd
BEAM OFF

send to monitor: 10

 

ASIC: TH 1320, noisy pixel masekd
BEAM ON

send to monitor: 10

 

ASIC: TH 1320, noisy pixel masekd
BEAM ON

Warning -> not sure, restart

 

ASIC: TH 1325, noisy pixel masekd
BEAM ON

send everything to monitor

ASIC: TH 1320, noisy pixel masekd
BEAM ON

send everything to monitor

ASIC: TH 1310, noisy pixel masekd
BEAM ON

send everything to monitor

ASIC: TH 1330, noisy pixel masekd
BEAM ON

send everything to monitor

repeat run 32 with noisy pixel masked

ASIC: TH 1330
BEAM ON

ASIC: TH 1330
BEAM ON

ASIC: TH 1330
BEAM ON

ASIC: TH 1340
BEAM ON

ASIC: TH 1350
BEAM ON

ASIC: TH 1350
BEAM OFF

ASIC: TH 1310
BEAM OFF

ASIC: TH 1310 seems to be okay
BEAM ON all included

ASIC: TH 1310 seems to be okay
BEAM ON all included

ASIC: TH 1310 seems to be okay
BEAM ON all included

2 GUIs started -> New Run

ASIC: TH 1330
BEAM ON all included

ASIC: TH 1330
BEAM ON all included

ASIC: TH 1330
BEAM OFF, for TH check

only few (1 or 2) pixel fire at a low frequency.

Will use this threshold from now on.

ASIC: TH 1350
BEAM OFF, for TH check

no noise hits

ASIC: TH 1350
BEAM OFF, for TH check

MPW3 monitor not connected --> invalid

ASIC: TH 1300 again for verificationn - still too many noise hits
BEAM OFF, for TH check

ASIC: TH 1400
BEAM OFF, for TH check

ASIC: TH 1600 - too high
BEAM OFF, for TH check

ASIC: TH 1800 - too high, no noise hits
BEAM OFF, for TH check

ASIC: TH 1300
BEAM OFF, for TH check

ASIC: TH 1300

Ratenwechsel

Tracker: latency 42 > timing much better

ASIC: TH 1200

repeat run 9 again ;)

run 11 used for new local runs of tracker - hvcmos_mpw3_20221008_11_TLU_00-000011.xml

tracker seems fine, at least in the beginning

again APV sync errors at the end of the run

repeat run 9

max_trgs: 100

tracker still not working.

TLU: 6,8M Tracker nur 4 M -> Let's reset FADC

short run for uploading to analysis

First data run w/ ramon + tracker + MPW3 + monitor connected

~4 MHz particle rate
MPW3 data file size after 5 minutes: 11 GB :-$

Tracker lost data again.
[2022-10-08 08:49:11 CEST]    Error::FADCGbEMerger::Event missmatch
[2022-10-08 08:49:11 CEST]    Error::FADCGbEMerger::Event missmatch
[2022-10-08 08:49:11 CEST]    Error::FADCGbEMerger::Event missmatch
[2022-10-08 08:49:11 CEST]    Error::FADCGbEMerger::Event missmatch
[2022-10-08 08:49:11 CEST]    Warning::UDPUnpacker::Expected package number 1953610, got: 1953990!
 

Sync-Error L5.1.1 and L5.1.2

Tracker latency lat=42

First data run w/ ramon + tracker + MPW3 + monitor connected

Tracker dropped some udp packages, total tracker events 23166448

Tracker latency lat=42

RD50-MPW3 monitor connected first

Tracker latency lat=42

Tracker timing wrong, latency too low, peak at 0 --> changed lat from 40 to 41 for next run.

Tracker xml file: hvcmos_mpw3_20221008_TLU_00-000053.xml

Fluence loss measurement 11.12.2021

Start 18:17

90deg = all five steps Alu

Fluence loss measurement 11.12.2021

Start 15:15

0deg =1cm Alu

Fluence loss measurement 11.12.2021

Fluence loss measurement 11.12.2021

Fluence loss measurement 11.12.2021

Start 14:45

Bias voltage Diamond: 500

Bias voltage Si LGAD: -100

From a beam perspective the Diamond detector was the first target, on oscilloscope channel 4, the Si LGAD was the second target connected to oscilloscope channel 1.

Triggering source was the Si LGAD detector.

Data was stored on the HiBPM-Osci-2 NUC under c:\measurements

Bias voltage SiC: 800

Bias voltage Si LGAD: -100

From a beam perspective the SiC detector was the first target, on oscilloscope channel 4, the Si LGAD was the second target connected to oscilloscope channel 1.

Triggering source was the Si LGAD detector. The SiC detector was most probably defective.

Data was stored on the HiBPM-Osci-2 NUC under c:\measurements

Bias voltage SiC: 800

Bias voltage Si: -150

From a beam perspective the Si detector was the first target, on oscilloscope  channel 1, SiC was the second target connected to oscilloscope channel 3.

Triggering source was the Si detector.

The compliancy of the SiC SMU triggered after approx. 50% of the events had been acquired after this event the HV for the SiC HV was shut down.

Data was stored on the HiBPM-Osci-2 NUC under c:\measurements

Bias voltage SiC: 800

Bias voltage Si: -150

From a beam perspective the Si detector was the first target, on oscilloscope  channel 1, SiC was the second target connected to oscilloscope channel 3.

Triggering source was the SiC detector.

Data was stored on the HiBPM-Osci-2 NUC under c:\measurements

Start: 21.04

reference run 100.4MeV

Start: 19:28

1 cm Alu stair phantom on rotary table (0deg)

Start: 18:00

1 cm Alu stair phantom on rotary table (90deg)

Start: 16:40

1 cm Alu stair phantom on rotary table (90deg--> 0.2-1cm Alu)

Start: 15:19

1 cm Alu stair phantom on rotary table (0deg--> always 1cm Al in beam)

Start: 14:04

Reference run without phantom

Start: 13:58

Alignment run without phantom

Start: 12:00
WET measurement of PMMA slabs also used for TOF-CT (GSI)

5cm PMMA. higher energy for Felix Feichtinger
"Accumalte Charge"

more detailed measurement

Start: 11:44
WET measurement of PMMA slabs also used for TOF-CT (GSI)

5cm PMMA. higher energy for Felix Feichtinger
"Accumalte Charge"

coarse run

Start: 11:24
WET measurement of PMMA slabs also used for TOF-CT (GSI)

5cm PMMA
"Accumalte Charge"

PMMA was activated. Had to wait ~10-15min after measurement

Start: 11:00
WET measurement of PMMA slabs also used for TOF-CT (GSI)

4cm PMMA
"Accumalte Charge"

PMMA was activated. Had to wait ~10-15min after measurement

Start: 10:30
WET measurement of PMMA slabs also used for TOF-CT (GSI)

3cm PMMA
"Accumalte Charge"

PMMA was activated. Had to wait ~10-15min after measurement

Start: 10:06
WET measurement of PMMA slabs also used for TOF-CT (GSI)

2cm PMMA
"Accumalte Charge"

PMMA was activated. Had to wait ~10-15min after measurement

Start: 09:38
WET measurement of PMMA slabs also used for TOF-CT (GSI)

1cm PMMA
"Accumalte Charge"

PMMA was activated. Had to wait ~10-15min after measurement

Start: 09:14
WET measurement of PMMA slabs also used for TOF-CT (GSI)

reference run
"Accumalte Charge"

Start: 08:55
WET measurement of PMMA slabs also used for TOF-CT (GSI)

reference run (with Arduino Spill Start/Stop logic)
fringes in Bragg peak (trigger not optimal (maybe too much latency with Arduino))--> next measurement with "Accumalte Charge" instead of "Spill Start/Stop"

Start: 08:30
WET measurement of PMMA slabs also used for TOF-CT (GSI)

coarse run (to find Bragg range

Start: 07:44 O(kHz)

Start: 07:39 O(kHz)

Start: 07:33 O(kHz)

Start: 07:26 O(100kHz)

Start: 07:20 O(100kHz)

Start: 07:13 O(100kHz)

Start: 07:07 O(MHz)

Start: 07:01 O(MHz)

Start: 06:54 O(MHz)

Start: 06:46 O(MHz)

Start: 06:40 O(100kHz)

Start: 06:33 O(kHz)

beamtime on 18.09.2021
CH1: SiC
CH3: Si
Bias_Si: -100 V
Bias_SiC: 1100 V
Noise measurement

beamtime on 18.09.2021
CH1: SiC
CH3: Si
Bias_Si: -100 V
Bias_SiC: 1100 V

beamtime on 18.09.2021
CH1: SiC
CH3: Si
Bias_Si: -100 V
Bias_SiC: 800 V

beamtime on 18.09.2021
CH1: SiC
CH3: Si
Bias_Si: -100 V
Bias_SiC: 600 V

beamtime on 18.09.2021
CH1: SiC
CH3: Si
Bias_Si: -100 V
Bias_SiC: 400 V

beamtime on 18.09.2021
CH1: SiC
CH3: Si
Bias_Si: -100 V
Bias_SiC: 400 V

beamtime on 18.09.2021
CH1: SiC
CH3: Si
Bias_Si: -100 V
Bias_SiC: 600 V

beamtime on 18.09.2021
CH1: SiC
CH3: Si
Bias_Si: -100 V
Bias_SiC: 800 V

beamtime on 18.09.2021
CH1: SiC
CH3: Si
Bias_Si: -100 V
Bias_SiC: 1100 V

beamtime on 18.09.2021
CH1: SiC
CH3: Si
Bias_Si: -100 V
Bias_SiC: 1100 V

beamtime on 18.09.2021
CH1: SiC
CH3: Si
Bias_Si: -100 V
Bias_SiC: 1100 V

beamtime on 18.09.2021
CH1: SiC
CH3: Si
Bias_Si: -100 V
Bias_SiC: 1100 V

beamtime on 18.09.2021
CH1: SiC
CH3: Si
Bias_Si: -100 V
Bias_SiC: 1100 V

beamtime on 18.09.2021
CH1: SiC
CH3: Si
Bias_Si: -100 V
Bias_SiC: 800 V

beamtime on 18.09.2021
CH1: SiC
CH3: Si
Bias_Si: -100 V
Bias_SiC: 600 V

beamtime on 18.09.2021
CH1: SiC
CH3: Si
Bias_Si: -100 V
Bias_SiC: 600 V

beamtime on 18.09.2021
CH1: SiC
CH3: Si
Bias_Si: -100 V
Bias_SiC: 800 V

beamtime on 18.09.2021
CH1: SiC
CH3: Si
Bias_Si: -100 V
Bias_SiC: 1100 V

beamtime on 18.09.2021
CH1: SiC
CH3: Si
Bias_Si: -100 V
Bias_SiC: 600 V

beamtime on 18.09.2021
CH1: SiC
CH3: Si
Bias_Si: -100 V
Bias_SiC: 400 V

beamtime on 18.09.2021
CH1: SiC
CH3: Si
Bias_Si: -100 V
Bias_SiC: 1100 V
Trigger SiC

beamtime on 18.09.2021
CH1: SiC
CH3: Si
Bias_Si: -100 V
Bias_SiC: 1000 V
Trigger SiC

beamtime on 18.09.2021
CH1: SiC
CH3: Si
Bias_Si: -100 V
Bias_SiC: 800 V
Trigger SiC

beamtime on 18.09.2021
CH1: SiC
CH3: Si
Bias_Si: -100 V
Bias_SiC: 400 V
Repeat of run 13

beamtime on 18.09.2021
CH1: SiC
CH3: Si
Bias_Si: -100 V
Bias_SiC: 400 V

beamtime on 18.09.2021
CH1: SiC
CH3: Si
Bias_Si: -100 V
Bias_SiC: 400 V
Cividec for SiC

01. SiC; 2. Si

Small SiC Signal;
Cividec for SiC

01. SiC; 2. Si

Bias 1: 400V; Bias 2: -100 V; SiC with Cividec

TB 20.6.21

Start 20:10
Mean rate O(200MHz)
 

TB 20.6.21

Start 18:45
2cm Phantom thickness
Mean rate O(MHz)
for live TOF estimation: TDC3,channel 9 - TDC2,channel9

last sensor did not work

TB 20.6.21

Start 19:19
Mean rate O(MHz)
 

TB 20.6.21

Start 18:03
1cm Phantom thickness
Mean rate O(MHz)
for live TOF estimation: TDC3,channel 9 - TDC2,channel9

last sensor stopped working
 

TB 20.6.21

Start 17:27
3cm Phantom thickness
Mean rate O(MHz)
for live TOF estimation: TDC3,channel 9 - TDC2,channel9
 

TB 20.6.21

Start 16:46
0cm Phantom thickness
Mean rate O(MHz)
reference run without phantom
for live TOF estimation: TDC3,channel 9 - TDC2,channel9
 

TB 20.6.21

Start 15:55
5cm Phantom thickness
Mean rate O(MHz)
gain in last 2 layers was adapted
RamonRun 11 was not stopped (beam was still on from previous run)
for live TOF estimation: TDC3,channel 9 - TDC2,channel9
 

TB 20.6.21

Start 15:00 (late handover and copying of data)
5cm Phantom thickness
Mean rate O(MHz)

signal in last 2 LGADs too high (only 52MeV residual energy after 5cm)
 

TB 19.6.21

Start 21:50

Nominal flux degrader 10: mean rate O(200MHz)
 

TB 19.6.21

Start 19:43
rate setting was not set correctly deg20 in combination with setting VII instead of nominal flux deg10
 

TB 19.6.21

Start 19:16
Mean rate O(MHz)
 

TB 19.6.21

Start 18:48
Mean rate O(MHz)
 

TB 19.6.21

Start 18:15
Mean rate O(MHz)
 

TB 19.6.21

Start 17:42
Mean rate O(MHz)
 

TB 19.6.21

Start 17:13

Mean rate O(MHz)
 

TB 19.6.21

Start 11:21
paused beam at 13:36
15:40-16:20 ECR source fail--downtime

Mean rate O(MHz)

TB 19.6.21

Start 07:51
beam was paused at 10:10

bias run and threshold optimization

mean rate was O(100kHz)

TB 19.6.21

Start 06:00
startet with wrong setting at the beginning (6 instead of 5) rate was then corrected, but RaMon was still running.

Final rate: 100kHz setting
07:24: room request: changed channel on board (was not connected to osci)

TB 24.4.21

corrected trigger position for fluence loss radiography

0deg (1cm ABS)

TB 24.4.21

0deg (1cm ABS)

TB 24.4.21

0deg (1cm PMMA)

TB 24.4.21

90deg (0.2-1cm PMMA)

TB 24.4.21

90deg (0.2-1cm PMMA)

TB 24.4.21

0deg (1cm PMMA)

timing was adjusted and FADC had to be restarted

TB 24.4.21

0deg (1cm Alu)

TB 24.4.21

90deg (0.2-1cmAlu)

TB 24.4.21

90deg (0.2-1cmAlu)

TB 24.4.21
 

0deg (1cm Alu) Profil von Stiege

TB 24.4.21
Alignment run

TB 24.4.21
Alignment run

Energy Scan
03:06-5:18
MHz Rate
Danach: Abbauen

Energy Scan
03:02
4Hz, VII -> MHz ?

Energy Scan
02:48
1-6M Hz!

Energy Scan
01:54
Filter vermutlich draussen

Energy Scan
01:35
Filter vermutlich draussen

Energy Scan
01:10
Filter vermutlich draussen

Energy Scan
00:46
Filter vermutlich draussen

Energy Scan
00:21
Filter vermutlich draussen

Testrun for Beam
Ripple Filter jumping around

Testrun for Beam
Davor: Filter-Spiele :D

Energy Scan SiC Sensor
23:37
30.000 Hz, falsche Rate -> Filter

Energy Scan SiC Sensor
23:36
timing zu frueh

2er Koinzidenz
Alignment Run SiC
23:21

2er Koinzidenz
Alignment Run SiC -> Crap, FADCs abgeschmiert

2er Koinzidenz
Tracker only, ALIGNMENT
Danach: Umbau auf SiC (Junctionboard geaendert) fuer SiC Alignment

2er Koinzidenz
Tracker only, Alignment run -> FADC crashed

2er Koinzidenz
Row 3 Col 4
for Beam

3er Koinzidenz
Row 3 Col 4
WINDOW RUN
Trigger-Busy + Max Trigger unkown, check in log-file

2er Koinzidenz
Row 3 Col 4
Trigger-Busy + Max Trigger unkown, check in log-file

2er Koinzidenz
Row 3 Col 4
Trigger-Busy + Max Trigger unkown, check in log-file

2er Koinzidenz
Row 3 Col 4
Trigger-Busy + Max Trigger unkown, check in log-file

2er Koinzidenz
Row 3 Col 4
Trigger-Busy: 25, Max Trigger:50

2er Koinzidenz
Row 3 Col 4
Trigger-Busy: 23, Max Trigger geaendert

2er Koinzidenz
Row 3 Col 4
Neues Beam Files -> Rate nun richtig.

2er Koinzidenz
Row 3 Col 4
Ramonhuengl ?????? (Handschrift unlesbar)

2er Koinzidenz
Row 3 Col 4
Trigger-Busy: 23, Max Trigger 100 -> Gute Settings!

2er Koinzidenz
Row 3 Col 4
test, neue Beam Data: CPD Data neu geladen

2er Koinzidenz
Row 3 Col 4
test

3er Koinzidenz
for Beam

3er Koinzidenz
for Beam

3er Koinzidenz
for Beam

3er Koinzidenz
for Beam

3er Koinzidenz
for Beam

2er Koinzidenz
Pix 06, 33, 34
for Beam

3er Koinzidenz
Pix 06, 33, 34

3er Koinzidenz
Pix 06, 33, 34

3er Koinzidenz
Pix 06, 33, 34