 Sat Dec 14 12:52:57 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Shift 23.11.24 low flux He test with RaMon, 3, RaMon, 147.2 MeV/u, Low Flux Medium, Helium, Good, 06:32, 06:33, 1, , ,
|
Mean rate per spill~ 2.5-4-5E5 p/s (online estimation without proper analysis) |
|
Sat Dec 14 12:53:28 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Shift 23.11.24 low flux He test with RaMon, 4, RaMon, 124.4 MeV/u, Low Flux Medium, Helium, Good, 06:33, 06:33, 1, , ,
|
Mean rate per spill~ 2-8E5 p/s (online estimation without proper analysis) |
|
Sat Dec 14 12:54:04 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Shift 23.11.24 low flux He test with RaMon, 5, RaMon, 97.2MeV/u, Low Flux Medium, Helium, Good, 06:33, 06:33, 1, , ,
|
Mean rate per spill~ 1-5E5 p/s (online estimation without proper analysis) |
|
Sat Dec 14 12:54:55 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Shift 23.11.24 low flux He test with RaMon, 6, RaMon, 73.2 MeV/u, Low Flux Medium, Helium, Good, 06:34, 06:34, 1, , ,
|
Mean rate per spill~ 4.5-8E5 p/s (online estimation without proper analysis) |
|
Sat Dec 14 12:55:41 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Shift 23.11.24 low flux He test with RaMon, 7, RaMon, 63.3 MeV/u, Low Flux Medium, Helium, Good, 06:35, 06:36, 1, , ,
|
Mean rate per spill~ 2-5E5 p/s (online estimation without proper analysis) |
|
Sat Dec 14 12:56:05 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Shift 23.11.24 low flux He test with RaMon, 8, RaMon, 205.2 MeV/u, Low Flux High, Helium, Good, 06:39, 06:40, 1, , ,
|
Mean rate per spill~ 5e6 p/s (online estimation without proper analysis) |
|
Sat Dec 14 12:56:38 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Shift 23.11.24 low flux He test with RaMon, 9, RaMon, 177.8 MeV/u, Low Flux High, Helium, Good, 06:40, 06:41, 1, , ,
|
Mean rate per spill~ 4.5e6 p/s (online estimation without proper analysis) |
|
Sat Dec 14 12:57:13 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Shift 23.11.24 low flux He test with RaMon, 10, RaMon, 147.2 MeV/u, Low Flux High, Helium, Good, 06:42, 06:42, 1, , ,
|
Mean rate per spill~ 3..5e6 p/s (online estimation without proper analysis) |
|
Sat Dec 14 12:58:35 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Shift 23.11.24 low flux He test with RaMon, 11, RaMon, 124.4 MeV/u, Low Flux High, Helium, Good, 06:43, 06:43, 1, , ,
|
Mean rate per spill~ 4Ee6 p/s (online estimation without proper analysis) |
|
Sat Dec 14 12:59:33 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Shift 23.11.24 low flux He test with RaMon, 12, RaMon, 97.2MeV/u, Low Flux High, Helium, Good, 06:43, 06:44, 1, , ,
|
Mean rate per spill~ 6Ee6 p/s (online estimation without proper analysis) |
|
Sat Dec 14 13:00:26 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Shift 23.11.24 low flux He test with RaMon, 13, RaMon, 73.2 MeV/u, Low Flux High, Helium, Good, 06:44, 06:45, 1, , ,
|
Mean rate per spill~ 4Ee6 p/s (online estimation without proper analysis) |
|
Sat Dec 14 13:01:14 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Shift 23.11.24 low flux He test with RaMon, 14, RaMon, 63.3 MeV/u, Low Flux High, Helium, Good, 06:46, 06:46, 1, , ,
|
Mean rate per spill~ 5Ee6 p/s (online estimation without proper analysis) |
|
Sat Dec 14 13:02:29 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Shift 23.11.24 low flux Carbon test with RaMon (did not work), 15, RaMon, , Low Flux High, Carbon, Crap, 06:55, 07:01, 6, , ,
|
Low flux carbon did not work
1µs EFE, 30s Extraction, Deg100
we tried different energies (402.MeV/u)-> 120 MeV/u, but unfortunately we did not get any beam |
|
Sat Dec 14 13:04:57 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Shift 23.11.24 low flux Carbon test with RaMon (did not work), 16, RaMon, , Low Flux High, Carbon, Crap, 07:02, 07:20, 18, , ,
|
Low flux carbon did not work
5µs EFE, 10s Extraction, Deg100
we tried different energies (402.MeV/u)-> 238 MeV/u, but unfortunately we did not get any beam |
|
Sat Dec 14 13:07:15 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Energy vs TOF calibration, 17, TOF-Cal GSI (TRB)+DOGMA setup(diamond+LGAD)+RaMon, 205.2 MeV/u, Low Flux Medium, Helium, Good, 08:46, 09:42, 56, , ,
|
before run, setups had to be aligned (first slab in slabholder was put in isocentre. However, in this run, no slab was used). Room was closed at 08:10
Beam->Nozzle-> Slabholder->TOF-CAL (TRB)-> DOGMA Setup(Diamond+LGADs)-> RaMon
TRB Setup: 260V bias and 250mA pre-amps, threshold 1000
measured 400kHz with Ramon and only 100kHz with LGADs (third LGAD) and 60kHz accepted trrigger rate
beam was shifted vertically by x? cm? (need to lookup again). So TRB setup was shifted with motors such that the He beam was hitting the centre of the LGADs |
|
Sat Dec 14 13:16:33 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Energy vs TOF calibration +Alignment of DOGMA setup, 18, TOF-Cal GSI (TRB)+DOGMA setup(diamond+LGAD)+RaMon, 205.2 MeV/u, Low Flux Medium, Helium, Good, 09:42, 09:48, 6, , ,
|
TRB Setup: 260V bias and 250mA pre-amps, threshold 1000
DOGMA setup had to be shifted manually to align it with the beam |
|
Sat Dec 14 13:26:29 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Energy vs TOF calibration, 19, TOF-Cal GSI (TRB)+DOGMA setup(diamond+LGAD)+RaMon, 177.8 MeV/u, Low Flux Medium, Helium, Good, 10:08, 10:25, 17, , ,
|
TRB Setup: 260V bias and 250mA pre-amps, threshold 1000
750kHz with Ramon and only 160kHz with TRB, 44ps single channel res preacalib |
|
Sat Dec 14 13:28:57 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Energy vs TOF calibration, 20, TOF-Cal GSI (TRB)+DOGMA setup(diamond+LGAD)+RaMon, 147.2 MeV/u, Low Flux Medium, Helium, Good, 10:33, 10:38, 5, , ,
|
TRB Setup: 260V bias and 250mA pre-amps, threshold 1000
300kHz with Ramon and only 40kHz with TRB--> decision to go to low flux high was made |
|
Sat Dec 14 13:31:49 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Energy vs TOF calibration, 21, TOF-Cal GSI (TRB)+DOGMA setup(diamond+LGAD)+RaMon, 147.2 MeV/u, Low Flux High, Helium, Good, 10:41, 10:56, 15, , ,
|
TRB Setup: 260V bias and 250mA pre-amps, threshold 1000
3.5MHz with Ramon and only 600kHz with TRB-52ps single channel res prae calib |
|
Sat Dec 14 13:34:18 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Energy vs TOF calibration, 21, TOF-Cal GSI (TRB)+DOGMA setup(diamond+LGAD)+RaMon, 97.2MeV/u, Low Flux High, Helium, Good, 10:58, 11:23, 25, , ,
|
TRB Setup: 260V bias and 250mA pre-amps, threshold 1000
3MHz with Ramon and only 300kHz with TRB-44ps single channel res prae calib |
|