 Sat Dec 14 12:52:57 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Shift 23.11.24 low flux He test with RaMon, 3, RaMon, 147.2 MeV/u, Low Flux Medium, Helium, Good, 06:32, 06:33, 1, , ,
|
| Mean rate per spill~ 2.5-4-5E5 p/s (online estimation without proper analysis) |
|
Sat Dec 14 12:53:28 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Shift 23.11.24 low flux He test with RaMon, 4, RaMon, 124.4 MeV/u, Low Flux Medium, Helium, Good, 06:33, 06:33, 1, , ,
|
| Mean rate per spill~ 2-8E5 p/s (online estimation without proper analysis) |
|
Sat Dec 14 12:54:04 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Shift 23.11.24 low flux He test with RaMon, 5, RaMon, 97.2MeV/u, Low Flux Medium, Helium, Good, 06:33, 06:33, 1, , ,
|
| Mean rate per spill~ 1-5E5 p/s (online estimation without proper analysis) |
|
Sat Dec 14 12:54:55 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Shift 23.11.24 low flux He test with RaMon, 6, RaMon, 73.2 MeV/u, Low Flux Medium, Helium, Good, 06:34, 06:34, 1, , ,
|
| Mean rate per spill~ 4.5-8E5 p/s (online estimation without proper analysis) |
|
Sat Dec 14 12:55:41 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Shift 23.11.24 low flux He test with RaMon, 7, RaMon, 63.3 MeV/u, Low Flux Medium, Helium, Good, 06:35, 06:36, 1, , ,
|
| Mean rate per spill~ 2-5E5 p/s (online estimation without proper analysis) |
|
Sat Dec 14 12:56:05 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Shift 23.11.24 low flux He test with RaMon, 8, RaMon, 205.2 MeV/u, Low Flux High, Helium, Good, 06:39, 06:40, 1, , ,
|
| Mean rate per spill~ 5e6 p/s (online estimation without proper analysis) |
|
Sat Dec 14 12:56:38 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Shift 23.11.24 low flux He test with RaMon, 9, RaMon, 177.8 MeV/u, Low Flux High, Helium, Good, 06:40, 06:41, 1, , ,
|
| Mean rate per spill~ 4.5e6 p/s (online estimation without proper analysis) |
|
Sat Dec 14 12:57:13 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Shift 23.11.24 low flux He test with RaMon, 10, RaMon, 147.2 MeV/u, Low Flux High, Helium, Good, 06:42, 06:42, 1, , ,
|
| Mean rate per spill~ 3..5e6 p/s (online estimation without proper analysis) |
|
Sat Dec 14 12:58:35 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Shift 23.11.24 low flux He test with RaMon, 11, RaMon, 124.4 MeV/u, Low Flux High, Helium, Good, 06:43, 06:43, 1, , ,
|
| Mean rate per spill~ 4Ee6 p/s (online estimation without proper analysis) |
|
Sat Dec 14 12:59:33 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Shift 23.11.24 low flux He test with RaMon, 12, RaMon, 97.2MeV/u, Low Flux High, Helium, Good, 06:43, 06:44, 1, , ,
|
| Mean rate per spill~ 6Ee6 p/s (online estimation without proper analysis) |
|
Sat Dec 14 13:00:26 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Shift 23.11.24 low flux He test with RaMon, 13, RaMon, 73.2 MeV/u, Low Flux High, Helium, Good, 06:44, 06:45, 1, , ,
|
| Mean rate per spill~ 4Ee6 p/s (online estimation without proper analysis) |
|
Sat Dec 14 13:01:14 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Shift 23.11.24 low flux He test with RaMon, 14, RaMon, 63.3 MeV/u, Low Flux High, Helium, Good, 06:46, 06:46, 1, , ,
|
| Mean rate per spill~ 5Ee6 p/s (online estimation without proper analysis) |
|
Sat Dec 14 13:02:29 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Shift 23.11.24 low flux Carbon test with RaMon (did not work), 15, RaMon, , Low Flux High, Carbon, Crap, 06:55, 07:01, 6, , ,
|
Low flux carbon did not work
1µs EFE, 30s Extraction, Deg100
we tried different energies (402.MeV/u)-> 120 MeV/u, but unfortunately we did not get any beam |
|
Sat Dec 14 13:04:57 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Shift 23.11.24 low flux Carbon test with RaMon (did not work), 16, RaMon, , Low Flux High, Carbon, Crap, 07:02, 07:20, 18, , ,
|
Low flux carbon did not work
5µs EFE, 10s Extraction, Deg100
we tried different energies (402.MeV/u)-> 238 MeV/u, but unfortunately we did not get any beam |
|
Sat Dec 14 13:07:15 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Energy vs TOF calibration, 17, TOF-Cal GSI (TRB)+DOGMA setup(diamond+LGAD)+RaMon, 205.2 MeV/u, Low Flux Medium, Helium, Good, 08:46, 09:42, 56, , ,
|
before run, setups had to be aligned (first slab in slabholder was put in isocentre. However, in this run, no slab was used). Room was closed at 08:10
Beam->Nozzle-> Slabholder->TOF-CAL (TRB)-> DOGMA Setup(Diamond+LGADs)-> RaMon |
|
Sat Dec 14 13:16:33 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Energy vs TOF calibration +Alignment of DOGMA setup, 18, TOF-Cal GSI (TRB)+DOGMA setup(diamond+LGAD)+RaMon, 205.2 MeV/u, Low Flux Medium, Helium, Good, 09:42, 09:48, 6, , ,
|
TRB Setup: 260V bias and 250mA pre-amps, threshold 1000
DOGMA setup had to be shifted manually to align it with the beam |
|
Sat Dec 14 13:26:29 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Energy vs TOF calibration, 19, TOF-Cal GSI (TRB)+DOGMA setup(diamond+LGAD)+RaMon, 177.8 MeV/u, Low Flux Medium, Helium, Good, 10:08, 10:25, 17, , ,
|
TRB Setup: 260V bias and 250mA pre-amps, threshold 1000
750kHz with Ramon and only 160kHz with TRB, 44ps single channel res preacalib |
|
Sat Dec 14 13:28:57 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Energy vs TOF calibration, 20, TOF-Cal GSI (TRB)+DOGMA setup(diamond+LGAD)+RaMon, 147.2 MeV/u, Low Flux Medium, Helium, Good, 10:33, 10:38, 5, , ,
|
TRB Setup: 260V bias and 250mA pre-amps, threshold 1000
300kHz with Ramon and only 40kHz with TRB--> decision to go to low flux high was made |
|
Sat Dec 14 13:31:49 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Energy vs TOF calibration, 21, TOF-Cal GSI (TRB)+DOGMA setup(diamond+LGAD)+RaMon, 147.2 MeV/u, Low Flux High, Helium, Good, 10:41, 10:56, 15, , ,
|
TRB Setup: 260V bias and 250mA pre-amps, threshold 1000
3.5MHz with Ramon and only 600kHz with TRB-52ps single channel res prae calib |
|
Sat Dec 14 13:34:18 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Energy vs TOF calibration, 21, TOF-Cal GSI (TRB)+DOGMA setup(diamond+LGAD)+RaMon, 97.2MeV/u, Low Flux High, Helium, Good, 10:58, 11:23, 25, , ,
|
TRB Setup: 260V bias and 250mA pre-amps, threshold 1000
3MHz with Ramon and only 300kHz with TRB-44ps single channel res prae calib |
|