| ID |
Date |
Author |
Subject |
Run Number |
DUT |
Beam Energy |
Rate Setting |
Particle Type |
Events |
Data |
Beam Betatron |
Beam Chopper |
Beam Degrader |
Beam EFE |
Beam Orb |
Beam QuadScan |
PhantomType |
PhantomAngle |
|
70
|
Wed Jan 20 17:52:12 2021 |
Felix Ulrich-Pur | Lowflux p800 commissioning | 80 | Ramon+Tracker | 800 | | | 30 spills | | 100% | 60.5% | 20 | 30 | 6dB | | | |
MT=1, BSY=50
beam off
potential setting VII
steering setting IV + shift in -y direction |
|
71
|
Wed Jan 20 17:52:28 2021 |
Felix Ulrich-Pur | Lowflux p800 commissioning | 81 | Ramon+Tracker | 800 | | | 30 spills | | 100% | 60.5% | 20 | 30 | 6dB | | | |
MT=1, BSY=50,
beam off
potential setting VII
steering setting IV + bigger shift in -y direction |
|
72
|
Wed Jan 20 17:52:49 2021 |
Felix Ulrich-Pur | Lowflux p800 commissioning | 82 | Ramon+Tracker | 800 | | | 30 spills | | 100% | 60.5% | 20 | 30 | 6dB | | | |
MT=1, BSY=50,
potential setting VII
new steering +12.5mm x,+10mm y ( -beam direction), still off |
|
73
|
Wed Jan 20 17:55:13 2021 |
Felix Ulrich-Pur | Lowflux p800 commissioning | 83 | Ramon+Tracker | 800 | | | 30 spills | | 100% | 60.5% | 20 | 30 | 6dB | | | |
MT=1, BSY=50,
final setting VII
new steering VII +12.5mm x,+13mm y ( -beam direction) |
|
74
|
Wed Jan 20 17:56:06 2021 |
Felix Ulrich-Pur | Lowflux p800 commissioning | 84 | Ramon+Tracker | 800 | | | 30 spills | | 12% | 60.5% | 20 | 30 | 6dB | | | |
MT=1, BSY=50,
setting VI steering VII,beam is off again |
|
75
|
Wed Jan 20 17:57:16 2021 |
Felix Ulrich-Pur | Lowflux p800 commissioning | 85 | Ramon+Tracker | 800 | | | 30 spills | Unknown | 100% | 60.5% | 20 | 10 | 6dB | | | |
MT=1, BSY=50,
setting V steering VII,beam looks centered, but rate and spot looks similar to setting VII, maybe wrong acc setting? --> don't use |
|
76
|
Sat Feb 27 09:26:27 2021 |
Felix Ulrich-Pur | Rate verification | 1 | SiC+Si+RaMon | 62.4 | III(EFE+SID2) | | | Unknown | | | | | | | | |
Start 06:37
rate looks okish. few emtpy spills
2021-02-27, 06:07:
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.475V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.112V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x: 0
y: 0
2021-02-27, 06:30:
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1
channel 2 unverändert
2021-02-27, 06:37:
Setting: 3
Run 1: 6:37 62.4 MeV, Rate geringer als erwartet
|
|
77
|
Sat Feb 27 09:28:07 2021 |
Felix Ulrich-Pur | Rate verification | 2 | SiC+Si+RaMon | 252.7 | III(EFE+SID2) | | | Crap | | | | | | | | |
Start 06:47
rate only 10Hz, stopped run, room request and rewired trigger.
NOTE: Problem was caused by operators: Optics were not set correctly after ramping up energy from 62.4 to 252.7, not trigger cable
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.475V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x: 0
y: 0 |
|
78
|
Sat Feb 27 09:29:41 2021 |
Felix Ulrich-Pur | Rate verification | 4 | SiC+Si+RaMon | 252.7 | III(EFE+SID2) | | | Good | | | | | | | | |
Start 06:55
reallocated correctly, rate looks similar to old measurements now (kHz ish)
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.475V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x: 0
y: 0 |
|
79
|
Sat Feb 27 09:30:32 2021 |
Felix Ulrich-Pur | Rate verification | 5 | SiC+Si+RaMon | 62.4 | III(EFE+SID2) | | | Good | | | | | | | | |
Start 07:03
verified if run 1 was reliable-->Same results
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.475V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x: 0
y: 0 |
|
80
|
Sat Feb 27 09:31:57 2021 |
Felix Ulrich-Pur | Rate verification | 6 | SiC+Si+RaMon | 252.7 | I(EFE+SID0) | | | Good | | | | | | | | |
Start 07:16
rate looks fine,
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.475V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x: 0
y: 0
SiC: man sieht erstmals Signale |
|
81
|
Sat Feb 27 09:40:15 2021 |
Felix Ulrich-Pur | Rate verification | 7 | SiC+Si+RaMon | 62.4 | I(EFE+SID0) | | | Good | | | | | | | | |
Start 07:40
rate looks fine, however operators mentioned, that CPD data might have been loaded incorrectly-->pause during run and reloaded (07:48), rate seems unchanged
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.475V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x: 0
y: 0
|
|
82
|
Sat Feb 27 09:41:06 2021 |
Felix Ulrich-Pur | Waveforms SiC+Si | 8 | SiC+Si+RaMon | 252.7 | I(EFE+SID0) | | | Good | | | | | | | | |
08:34 room request, PC for SiC had to be restarted, trigger were connected as prior to shift
Start 08:53
rate looks fine
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.475V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
verändere Position, ab 7:49 bei Aufnahme von Waveforms Position:
x = 0
y = 0
7:51 verändere Position
7:58 neue Position:
x = 8
y = 68
FPGA shutdown --> Datenaufzeichnung bis etwa 8:27, ab dann Suchen des Fehlers
|
|
83
|
Sat Feb 27 09:42:44 2021 |
Felix Ulrich-Pur | Waveforms SiC+Si | 9 | SiC+Si+RaMon | 145.4 | I(EFE+SID0) | | | Good | | | | | | | | |
Start 09:37
SiC setrup had to be rewired (wr0ng polarity somewhere (insert here))
Umstellen:
channel 2: LVDS-Signal vertauschen
channel 2 Referenz: 2.100 V
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.475V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x = 8
y = 68 |
|
84
|
Sat Feb 27 18:36:15 2021 |
Felix Ulrich-Pur | Waveforms SiC+Si | 10 | SiC+Si+RaMon | 145.4 | I(EFE+SID0) | | | Good | | | | | | | | |
Start 10:10
polarity now correct
Wiederholung von vorher, aber keine Aufnahme von neuen Waveforms
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.100 V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x = 8
y = 68 |
|
85
|
Sat Feb 27 18:38:09 2021 |
Felix Ulrich-Pur | Waveforms SiC+Si | 11 | SiC+Si+RaMon | 62.4 | I(EFE+SID0) | | | Good | | | | | | | | |
Start 10:24
polarity now correct
no signal in sic --> energy too low due to scintis
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.100 V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x = 8
y = 68 |
|
86
|
Sat Feb 27 18:38:54 2021 |
Felix Ulrich-Pur | Waveforms SiC+Si | 12 | SiC+Si+RaMon | 252.7 | I(EFE+SID0) | | | Good | | | | | | | | |
Start 10:28
polarity now correct
now signal in SiC
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.100 V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x = 8
y = 68 |
|
87
|
Sat Feb 27 18:42:13 2021 |
Felix Ulrich-Pur | Waveforms SiC+Si | 13 | SiC+Si+RaMon | 252.7 | III(EFE+SID2) | | | Good | | | | | | | | |
Start 10:38
no signal in SiC
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.100 V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x = 8
y = 68 |
|
88
|
Sat Feb 27 18:43:12 2021 |
Felix Ulrich-Pur | Waveforms SiC+Si | 14 | SiC+Si+RaMon | 145.4 | III(EFE+SID2) | | | Good | | | | | | | | |
Start 10:47
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.100 V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x = 8
y = 68 |
|
89
|
Sat Feb 27 18:43:35 2021 |
Felix Ulrich-Pur | Waveforms SiC+Si | 15 | SiC+Si+RaMon | 100.4 | III(EFE+SID2) | | | Good | | | | | | | | |
Start 11:09
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.100 V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x = 8
y = 68 |