Home CMS Production Clean room MedAustron HEPHY testbeams old
testbeam-MA2018 testbeam-MA2019 testbeam-MA2020 testbeam-MA2021 testbeam-MA2023 testbeam-MA2024
  Testbeams at MedAustron in 2024, Page 9 of 11  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Author Subject Run Number DUT Beam Energy Rate Setting Particle Type Data t-Start t-Stop Duration_min Frontend Phantom Phantom thicknessdown
  142   Sat Dec 14 12:52:57 2024 Felix Ulrich-PurShift 23.11.24 low flux He test with RaMon3RaMon147.2 MeV/uLow Flux MediumHeliumGood06:3206:331   

Mean rate per spill~ 2.5-4-5E5 p/s (online estimation without proper analysis)

  143   Sat Dec 14 12:53:28 2024 Felix Ulrich-PurShift 23.11.24 low flux He test with RaMon4RaMon124.4 MeV/uLow Flux MediumHeliumGood06:3306:331   

Mean rate per spill~ 2-8E5 p/s (online estimation without proper analysis)

  144   Sat Dec 14 12:54:04 2024 Felix Ulrich-PurShift 23.11.24 low flux He test with RaMon5RaMon97.2MeV/uLow Flux MediumHeliumGood06:3306:331   

Mean rate per spill~ 1-5E5 p/s (online estimation without proper analysis)

  145   Sat Dec 14 12:54:55 2024 Felix Ulrich-PurShift 23.11.24 low flux He test with RaMon6RaMon73.2 MeV/uLow Flux MediumHeliumGood06:3406:341   

Mean rate per spill~ 4.5-8E5 p/s (online estimation without proper analysis)

  146   Sat Dec 14 12:55:41 2024 Felix Ulrich-PurShift 23.11.24 low flux He test with RaMon7RaMon63.3 MeV/uLow Flux MediumHeliumGood06:3506:361   

Mean rate per spill~ 2-5E5 p/s (online estimation without proper analysis)

  147   Sat Dec 14 12:56:05 2024 Felix Ulrich-PurShift 23.11.24 low flux He test with RaMon8RaMon205.2 MeV/uLow Flux HighHeliumGood06:3906:401   

Mean rate per spill~ 5e6 p/s (online estimation without proper analysis)

  148   Sat Dec 14 12:56:38 2024 Felix Ulrich-PurShift 23.11.24 low flux He test with RaMon9RaMon177.8 MeV/uLow Flux HighHeliumGood06:4006:411   

Mean rate per spill~ 4.5e6 p/s (online estimation without proper analysis)

  149   Sat Dec 14 12:57:13 2024 Felix Ulrich-PurShift 23.11.24 low flux He test with RaMon10RaMon147.2 MeV/uLow Flux HighHeliumGood06:4206:421   

Mean rate per spill~ 3..5e6 p/s (online estimation without proper analysis)

  150   Sat Dec 14 12:58:35 2024 Felix Ulrich-PurShift 23.11.24 low flux He test with RaMon11RaMon124.4 MeV/uLow Flux HighHeliumGood06:4306:431   

Mean rate per spill~ 4Ee6 p/s (online estimation without proper analysis)

  151   Sat Dec 14 12:59:33 2024 Felix Ulrich-PurShift 23.11.24 low flux He test with RaMon12RaMon97.2MeV/uLow Flux HighHeliumGood06:4306:441   

Mean rate per spill~ 6Ee6 p/s (online estimation without proper analysis)

  152   Sat Dec 14 13:00:26 2024 Felix Ulrich-PurShift 23.11.24 low flux He test with RaMon13RaMon73.2 MeV/uLow Flux HighHeliumGood06:4406:451   

Mean rate per spill~ 4Ee6 p/s (online estimation without proper analysis)

  153   Sat Dec 14 13:01:14 2024 Felix Ulrich-PurShift 23.11.24 low flux He test with RaMon14RaMon63.3 MeV/uLow Flux HighHeliumGood06:4606:461   

Mean rate per spill~ 5Ee6 p/s (online estimation without proper analysis)

  154   Sat Dec 14 13:02:29 2024 Felix Ulrich-PurShift 23.11.24 low flux Carbon test with RaMon (did not work)15RaMon Low Flux HighCarbonCrap06:5507:016   

Low flux carbon did not work

1µs EFE, 30s Extraction, Deg100
we tried different energies (402.MeV/u)-> 120 MeV/u, but unfortunately we did not get any beam

  155   Sat Dec 14 13:04:57 2024 Felix Ulrich-PurShift 23.11.24 low flux Carbon test with RaMon (did not work)16RaMon Low Flux HighCarbonCrap07:0207:2018   

Low flux carbon did not work

5µs EFE, 10s Extraction, Deg100
we tried different energies (402.MeV/u)-> 238 MeV/u, but unfortunately we did not get any beam

  156   Sat Dec 14 13:07:15 2024 Felix Ulrich-PurEnergy vs TOF calibration17TOF-Cal GSI (TRB)+DOGMA setup(diamond+LGAD)+RaMon205.2 MeV/uLow Flux MediumHeliumGood08:4609:4256   

before run, setups had to be aligned (first slab in slabholder was put in isocentre. However, in this run, no slab was used). Room was closed at 08:10

Beam->Nozzle-> Slabholder->TOF-CAL (TRB)-> DOGMA Setup(Diamond+LGADs)-> RaMon

TRB Setup: 260V bias and 250mA pre-amps, threshold 1000

measured 400kHz with Ramon and only 100kHz with LGADs (third LGAD) and 60kHz accepted trrigger rate

beam was shifted vertically by x? cm? (need to lookup again). So TRB setup was shifted with motors such that the He beam was hitting the centre of the LGADs

  157   Sat Dec 14 13:16:33 2024 Felix Ulrich-PurEnergy vs TOF calibration +Alignment of DOGMA setup18TOF-Cal GSI (TRB)+DOGMA setup(diamond+LGAD)+RaMon205.2 MeV/uLow Flux MediumHeliumGood09:4209:486   

TRB Setup: 260V bias and 250mA pre-amps, threshold 1000

DOGMA setup had to be shifted manually to align it with the beam

  158   Sat Dec 14 13:26:29 2024 Felix Ulrich-PurEnergy vs TOF calibration19TOF-Cal GSI (TRB)+DOGMA setup(diamond+LGAD)+RaMon177.8 MeV/uLow Flux MediumHeliumGood10:0810:2517   

TRB Setup: 260V bias and 250mA pre-amps, threshold 1000

750kHz with Ramon and only 160kHz with TRB, 44ps single channel res preacalib

  159   Sat Dec 14 13:28:57 2024 Felix Ulrich-PurEnergy vs TOF calibration20TOF-Cal GSI (TRB)+DOGMA setup(diamond+LGAD)+RaMon147.2 MeV/uLow Flux MediumHeliumGood10:3310:385   

TRB Setup: 260V bias and 250mA pre-amps, threshold 1000

300kHz with Ramon and only 40kHz with TRB--> decision to go to low flux high was made

  160   Sat Dec 14 13:31:49 2024 Felix Ulrich-PurEnergy vs TOF calibration21TOF-Cal GSI (TRB)+DOGMA setup(diamond+LGAD)+RaMon147.2 MeV/uLow Flux HighHeliumGood10:4110:5615   

TRB Setup: 260V bias and 250mA pre-amps, threshold 1000

3.5MHz with Ramon and only 600kHz with TRB-52ps single channel res prae calib

  161   Sat Dec 14 13:34:18 2024 Felix Ulrich-PurEnergy vs TOF calibration21TOF-Cal GSI (TRB)+DOGMA setup(diamond+LGAD)+RaMon97.2MeV/uLow Flux HighHeliumGood10:5811:2325   

TRB Setup: 260V bias and 250mA pre-amps, threshold 1000

3MHz with Ramon and only 300kHz with TRB-44ps single channel res prae calib

ELOG V3.1.5-fc6679b