 Sat Feb 27 09:26:27 2021, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Rate verification, 1, SiC+Si+RaMon, 62.4, III(EFE+SID2), , , Unknown, , , , , , , ,
|
Start 06:37
rate looks okish. few emtpy spills
2021-02-27, 06:07:
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.475V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.112V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x: 0
y: 0
2021-02-27, 06:30:
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1
channel 2 unverändert
2021-02-27, 06:37:
Setting: 3
Run 1: 6:37 62.4 MeV, Rate geringer als erwartet
|
|
Sat Feb 27 09:28:07 2021, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Rate verification, 2, SiC+Si+RaMon, 252.7, III(EFE+SID2), , , Crap, , , , , , , ,
|
Start 06:47
rate only 10Hz, stopped run, room request and rewired trigger.
NOTE: Problem was caused by operators: Optics were not set correctly after ramping up energy from 62.4 to 252.7, not trigger cable
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.475V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x: 0
y: 0 |
|
Sat Feb 27 09:29:41 2021, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Rate verification, 4, SiC+Si+RaMon, 252.7, III(EFE+SID2), , , Good, , , , , , , ,
|
Start 06:55
reallocated correctly, rate looks similar to old measurements now (kHz ish)
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.475V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x: 0
y: 0 |
|
Sat Feb 27 09:30:32 2021, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Rate verification, 5, SiC+Si+RaMon, 62.4, III(EFE+SID2), , , Good, , , , , , , ,
|
Start 07:03
verified if run 1 was reliable-->Same results
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.475V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x: 0
y: 0 |
|
Sat Feb 27 09:31:57 2021, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Rate verification, 6, SiC+Si+RaMon, 252.7, I(EFE+SID0), , , Good, , , , , , , ,
|
Start 07:16
rate looks fine,
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.475V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x: 0
y: 0
SiC: man sieht erstmals Signale |
|
Sat Feb 27 09:40:15 2021, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Rate verification, 7, SiC+Si+RaMon, 62.4, I(EFE+SID0), , , Good, , , , , , , ,
|
Start 07:40
rate looks fine, however operators mentioned, that CPD data might have been loaded incorrectly-->pause during run and reloaded (07:48), rate seems unchanged
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.475V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x: 0
y: 0
|
|
Sat Feb 27 09:41:06 2021, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Waveforms SiC+Si, 8, SiC+Si+RaMon, 252.7, I(EFE+SID0), , , Good, , , , , , , ,
|
08:34 room request, PC for SiC had to be restarted, trigger were connected as prior to shift
Start 08:53
rate looks fine
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.475V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
verändere Position, ab 7:49 bei Aufnahme von Waveforms Position:
x = 0
y = 0
7:51 verändere Position
7:58 neue Position:
x = 8
y = 68
FPGA shutdown --> Datenaufzeichnung bis etwa 8:27, ab dann Suchen des Fehlers
|
|
Sat Feb 27 09:42:44 2021, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Waveforms SiC+Si, 9, SiC+Si+RaMon, 145.4, I(EFE+SID0), , , Good, , , , , , , ,
|
Start 09:37
SiC setrup had to be rewired (wr0ng polarity somewhere (insert here))
Umstellen:
channel 2: LVDS-Signal vertauschen
channel 2 Referenz: 2.100 V
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.475V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x = 8
y = 68 |
|
Sat Feb 27 18:36:15 2021, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Waveforms SiC+Si, 10, SiC+Si+RaMon, 145.4, I(EFE+SID0), , , Good, , , , , , , ,
|
Start 10:10
polarity now correct
Wiederholung von vorher, aber keine Aufnahme von neuen Waveforms
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.100 V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x = 8
y = 68 |
|
Sat Feb 27 18:38:09 2021, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Waveforms SiC+Si, 11, SiC+Si+RaMon, 62.4, I(EFE+SID0), , , Good, , , , , , , ,
|
Start 10:24
polarity now correct
no signal in sic --> energy too low due to scintis
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.100 V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x = 8
y = 68 |
|
Sat Feb 27 18:38:54 2021, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Waveforms SiC+Si, 12, SiC+Si+RaMon, 252.7, I(EFE+SID0), , , Good, , , , , , , ,
|
Start 10:28
polarity now correct
now signal in SiC
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.100 V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x = 8
y = 68 |
|
Sat Feb 27 18:42:13 2021, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Waveforms SiC+Si, 13, SiC+Si+RaMon, 252.7, III(EFE+SID2), , , Good, , , , , , , ,
|
Start 10:38
no signal in SiC
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.100 V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x = 8
y = 68 |
|
Sat Feb 27 18:43:12 2021, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Waveforms SiC+Si, 14, SiC+Si+RaMon, 145.4, III(EFE+SID2), , , Good, , , , , , , ,
|
Start 10:47
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.100 V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x = 8
y = 68 |
|
Sat Feb 27 18:43:35 2021, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Waveforms SiC+Si, 15, SiC+Si+RaMon, 100.4, III(EFE+SID2), , , Good, , , , , , , ,
|
Start 11:09
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.100 V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x = 8
y = 68 |
|
Sat Feb 27 18:44:06 2021, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Waveforms SiC+Si, 16, SiC+Si+RaMon, 100.4, I(EFE+SID0), , , Good, , , , , , , ,
|
Start 11:36
schöne Signale
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.100 V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x = 8
y = 68 |
|
Sat Feb 27 18:44:23 2021, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Waveforms SiC+Si, 17, SiC+Si+RaMon, 800, VII, , , Good, , , , , , , ,
|
Start 11:55
Stopped at 12:05-->acc failure
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.100 V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x = 8
y = 68 |
|
Sat Feb 27 18:49:06 2021, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Waveforms SiC+Si, 18, SiC+Si+RaMon, 800, VII, , , Good, , , , , , , ,
|
Start 12:39
Neustart der vorherigen Messung
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.100 V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x = 8
y = 68 |
|
Sat Feb 27 18:50:16 2021, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Waveforms SiC+Si, 19, SiC+Si+RaMon, 252.7, nominal, , , Good, , , 100, , , , ,
|
Start 13:40
Degrader 100
Messung aufgenommen, keine Screenshots
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.100 V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x = 8
y = 68 |
|
Sat Feb 27 18:52:12 2021, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Waveforms SiC+Si, 20, SiC+Si+RaMon, 252.7, nominal, Proton, , Good, , , 10, , , , ,
|
Start 13:42
Degrader 10
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.100 V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x = 8
y = 68 |
|
Sat Feb 27 18:56:11 2021, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Waveforms SiC+Si, 21, SiC+Si+RaMon, 252.7, nominal, Proton, , Good, , , 50, , , , ,
|
Start 13:56
Degrader 50
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.100 V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x = 8
y = 68
|
|