 Sun Nov 7 19:06:26 2021, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Peakfinder WET meas 7.11.21, 18, , 175.3, nominal, , , Good, , , 10, , , , none,
|
Start: 10:30
WET measurement of PMMA slabs also used for TOF-CT (GSI)
3cm PMMA
"Accumalte Charge"
PMMA was activated. Had to wait ~10-15min after measurement |
|
Sun Nov 7 19:06:40 2021, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Peakfinder WET meas 7.11.21, 19, , 175.3, nominal, , , Good, , , 10, , , , none,
|
Start: 11:00
WET measurement of PMMA slabs also used for TOF-CT (GSI)
4cm PMMA
"Accumalte Charge"
PMMA was activated. Had to wait ~10-15min after measurement |
|
Sun Nov 7 19:06:58 2021, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Peakfinder WET meas 7.11.21, 20, , 175.3, nominal, , , Good, , , 10, , , , none,
|
Start: 11:24
WET measurement of PMMA slabs also used for TOF-CT (GSI)
5cm PMMA
"Accumalte Charge"
PMMA was activated. Had to wait ~10-15min after measurement |
|
Sun Nov 7 19:07:31 2021, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Peakfinder WET meas 7.11.21, 21, , 194.3, nominal, , , Good, , , 10, , , , none,
|
Start: 11:44
WET measurement of PMMA slabs also used for TOF-CT (GSI)
5cm PMMA. higher energy for Felix Feichtinger
"Accumalte Charge"
coarse run |
|
Sun Nov 7 19:08:47 2021, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Peakfinder WET meas 7.11.21, 22, , 194.3, nominal, , , Good, , , 10, , , , none,
|
Start: 12:00
WET measurement of PMMA slabs also used for TOF-CT (GSI)
5cm PMMA. higher energy for Felix Feichtinger
"Accumalte Charge"
more detailed measurement |
|
Sun Jan 10 07:18:16 2021, Maximilian Tomaschek, Lowflux recommissioning, 26, Ramon+Tracker, , , , 30 spills, Good, , , , , , , ,
|
Spotsize test, nach power cycle |
|
Sun Jan 10 07:19:03 2021, Maximilian Tomaschek, Lowflux recommissioning, 27, Ramon+Tracker, , , , 30 spills, Good, , , , , , , ,
|
Spotsize test, nach power cycle |
|
Sun Jan 10 07:23:25 2021, Maximilian Tomaschek, Lowflux recommissioning, 32, Ramon+Tracker, 145.4, , , 10 spills 1e6 events, Good, 10%, , , 10, , , ,
|
Spotsize |
|
Sat Feb 27 09:26:27 2021, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Rate verification, 1, SiC+Si+RaMon, 62.4, III(EFE+SID2), , , Unknown, , , , , , , ,
|
Start 06:37
rate looks okish. few emtpy spills
2021-02-27, 06:07:
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.475V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.112V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x: 0
y: 0
2021-02-27, 06:30:
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1
channel 2 unverändert
2021-02-27, 06:37:
Setting: 3
Run 1: 6:37 62.4 MeV, Rate geringer als erwartet
|
|
Sat Feb 27 09:28:07 2021, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Rate verification, 2, SiC+Si+RaMon, 252.7, III(EFE+SID2), , , Crap, , , , , , , ,
|
Start 06:47
rate only 10Hz, stopped run, room request and rewired trigger.
NOTE: Problem was caused by operators: Optics were not set correctly after ramping up energy from 62.4 to 252.7, not trigger cable
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.475V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x: 0
y: 0 |
|
Sat Feb 27 09:29:41 2021, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Rate verification, 4, SiC+Si+RaMon, 252.7, III(EFE+SID2), , , Good, , , , , , , ,
|
Start 06:55
reallocated correctly, rate looks similar to old measurements now (kHz ish)
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.475V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x: 0
y: 0 |
|
Sat Feb 27 09:30:32 2021, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Rate verification, 5, SiC+Si+RaMon, 62.4, III(EFE+SID2), , , Good, , , , , , , ,
|
Start 07:03
verified if run 1 was reliable-->Same results
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.475V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x: 0
y: 0 |
|
Sat Feb 27 09:31:57 2021, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Rate verification, 6, SiC+Si+RaMon, 252.7, I(EFE+SID0), , , Good, , , , , , , ,
|
Start 07:16
rate looks fine,
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.475V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x: 0
y: 0
SiC: man sieht erstmals Signale |
|
Sat Feb 27 09:40:15 2021, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Rate verification, 7, SiC+Si+RaMon, 62.4, I(EFE+SID0), , , Good, , , , , , , ,
|
Start 07:40
rate looks fine, however operators mentioned, that CPD data might have been loaded incorrectly-->pause during run and reloaded (07:48), rate seems unchanged
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.475V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x: 0
y: 0
|
|
Sat Feb 27 09:41:06 2021, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Waveforms SiC+Si, 8, SiC+Si+RaMon, 252.7, I(EFE+SID0), , , Good, , , , , , , ,
|
08:34 room request, PC for SiC had to be restarted, trigger were connected as prior to shift
Start 08:53
rate looks fine
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.475V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
verändere Position, ab 7:49 bei Aufnahme von Waveforms Position:
x = 0
y = 0
7:51 verändere Position
7:58 neue Position:
x = 8
y = 68
FPGA shutdown --> Datenaufzeichnung bis etwa 8:27, ab dann Suchen des Fehlers
|
|
Sat Feb 27 09:42:44 2021, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Waveforms SiC+Si, 9, SiC+Si+RaMon, 145.4, I(EFE+SID0), , , Good, , , , , , , ,
|
Start 09:37
SiC setrup had to be rewired (wr0ng polarity somewhere (insert here))
Umstellen:
channel 2: LVDS-Signal vertauschen
channel 2 Referenz: 2.100 V
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.475V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x = 8
y = 68 |
|
Sat Feb 27 18:36:15 2021, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Waveforms SiC+Si, 10, SiC+Si+RaMon, 145.4, I(EFE+SID0), , , Good, , , , , , , ,
|
Start 10:10
polarity now correct
Wiederholung von vorher, aber keine Aufnahme von neuen Waveforms
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.100 V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x = 8
y = 68 |
|
Sat Feb 27 18:38:09 2021, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Waveforms SiC+Si, 11, SiC+Si+RaMon, 62.4, I(EFE+SID0), , , Good, , , , , , , ,
|
Start 10:24
polarity now correct
no signal in sic --> energy too low due to scintis
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.100 V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x = 8
y = 68 |
|
Sat Feb 27 18:38:54 2021, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Waveforms SiC+Si, 12, SiC+Si+RaMon, 252.7, I(EFE+SID0), , , Good, , , , , , , ,
|
Start 10:28
polarity now correct
now signal in SiC
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.100 V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x = 8
y = 68 |
|
Sat Feb 27 18:42:13 2021, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Waveforms SiC+Si, 13, SiC+Si+RaMon, 252.7, III(EFE+SID2), , , Good, , , , , , , ,
|
Start 10:38
no signal in SiC
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.100 V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x = 8
y = 68 |
|