| ID |
Date |
Author |
Subject |
Run Number |
DUT |
Beam Energy |
Rate Setting |
Particle Type |
Events |
Data |
Beam Betatron |
Beam Chopper |
Beam Degrader |
Beam EFE |
Beam Orb |
Beam QuadScan |
PhantomType |
PhantomAngle |
|
41
|
Sun Jan 10 07:32:00 2021 |
Maximilian Tomaschek | Lowflux recommissioning | 50 | Ramon+Tracker | 175.3 | | | 40 spills 350k events | Good | 10% | | 10 | 1 | | 2 | | |
Spotsize |
|
42
|
Sun Jan 10 07:32:11 2021 |
Maximilian Tomaschek | Lowflux recommissioning | 51 | Ramon+Tracker | 145.4 | | | 40 spills 350k events | Good | 10% | | 10 | 1 | | 2 | | |
Spotsize |
|
43
|
Sun Jan 10 07:32:22 2021 |
Maximilian Tomaschek | Lowflux recommissioning | 52 | Ramon+Tracker | 100.4 | | | 40 spills 350k events | Good | 10% | | 10 | 1 | | 2 | | |
Spotsize |
|
44
|
Sun Jan 10 07:32:34 2021 |
Maximilian Tomaschek | Lowflux recommissioning | 53 | Ramon+Tracker | 83 | | | 40 spills 350k events | Good | 10% | | 10 | 1 | | 2 | | |
Spotsize |
|
45
|
Sun Jan 10 07:32:46 2021 |
Maximilian Tomaschek | Lowflux recommissioning | 54 | Ramon+Tracker | 62.4 | | | 40 spills 350k events | Good | 10% | | 10 | 1 | | 2 | | |
Spotsize |
|
46
|
Sun Jan 10 07:33:19 2021 |
Maximilian Tomaschek | Lowflux recommissioning | 55 | Peakfinder | 252.7 | | | 40 spills 350k events | Good | | | 10 | 1 | | 0 | | |
fail MAPTA Sensor, not trigger, only signal with 5s spill 5s pause (spill over time meas), looked similar |
|
47
|
Wed Jan 20 17:12:15 2021 |
Felix Ulrich-Pur | Lowflux recommissioning | 4 | Ramon+Tracker | 145.4 | | | 30 spills | | 10% | | 10 | 1 | | | | |
Rate |
|
48
|
Wed Jan 20 17:15:32 2021 |
Felix Ulrich-Pur | Lowflux recommissioning | 13 | Ramon+Tracker | 145.4 | | | 30 spills | | 10% | | 10 | 1 | | 2 | | |
Rate |
|
76
|
Sat Feb 27 09:26:27 2021 |
Felix Ulrich-Pur | Rate verification | 1 | SiC+Si+RaMon | 62.4 | III(EFE+SID2) | | | Unknown | | | | | | | | |
Start 06:37
rate looks okish. few emtpy spills
2021-02-27, 06:07:
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.475V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.112V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x: 0
y: 0
2021-02-27, 06:30:
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1
channel 2 unverändert
2021-02-27, 06:37:
Setting: 3
Run 1: 6:37 62.4 MeV, Rate geringer als erwartet
|
|
77
|
Sat Feb 27 09:28:07 2021 |
Felix Ulrich-Pur | Rate verification | 2 | SiC+Si+RaMon | 252.7 | III(EFE+SID2) | | | Crap | | | | | | | | |
Start 06:47
rate only 10Hz, stopped run, room request and rewired trigger.
NOTE: Problem was caused by operators: Optics were not set correctly after ramping up energy from 62.4 to 252.7, not trigger cable
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.475V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x: 0
y: 0 |
|
78
|
Sat Feb 27 09:29:41 2021 |
Felix Ulrich-Pur | Rate verification | 4 | SiC+Si+RaMon | 252.7 | III(EFE+SID2) | | | Good | | | | | | | | |
Start 06:55
reallocated correctly, rate looks similar to old measurements now (kHz ish)
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.475V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x: 0
y: 0 |
|
79
|
Sat Feb 27 09:30:32 2021 |
Felix Ulrich-Pur | Rate verification | 5 | SiC+Si+RaMon | 62.4 | III(EFE+SID2) | | | Good | | | | | | | | |
Start 07:03
verified if run 1 was reliable-->Same results
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.475V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x: 0
y: 0 |
|
80
|
Sat Feb 27 09:31:57 2021 |
Felix Ulrich-Pur | Rate verification | 6 | SiC+Si+RaMon | 252.7 | I(EFE+SID0) | | | Good | | | | | | | | |
Start 07:16
rate looks fine,
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.475V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x: 0
y: 0
SiC: man sieht erstmals Signale |
|
81
|
Sat Feb 27 09:40:15 2021 |
Felix Ulrich-Pur | Rate verification | 7 | SiC+Si+RaMon | 62.4 | I(EFE+SID0) | | | Good | | | | | | | | |
Start 07:40
rate looks fine, however operators mentioned, that CPD data might have been loaded incorrectly-->pause during run and reloaded (07:48), rate seems unchanged
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.475V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x: 0
y: 0
|
|
82
|
Sat Feb 27 09:41:06 2021 |
Felix Ulrich-Pur | Waveforms SiC+Si | 8 | SiC+Si+RaMon | 252.7 | I(EFE+SID0) | | | Good | | | | | | | | |
08:34 room request, PC for SiC had to be restarted, trigger were connected as prior to shift
Start 08:53
rate looks fine
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.475V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
verändere Position, ab 7:49 bei Aufnahme von Waveforms Position:
x = 0
y = 0
7:51 verändere Position
7:58 neue Position:
x = 8
y = 68
FPGA shutdown --> Datenaufzeichnung bis etwa 8:27, ab dann Suchen des Fehlers
|
|
83
|
Sat Feb 27 09:42:44 2021 |
Felix Ulrich-Pur | Waveforms SiC+Si | 9 | SiC+Si+RaMon | 145.4 | I(EFE+SID0) | | | Good | | | | | | | | |
Start 09:37
SiC setrup had to be rewired (wr0ng polarity somewhere (insert here))
Umstellen:
channel 2: LVDS-Signal vertauschen
channel 2 Referenz: 2.100 V
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.475V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x = 8
y = 68 |
|
84
|
Sat Feb 27 18:36:15 2021 |
Felix Ulrich-Pur | Waveforms SiC+Si | 10 | SiC+Si+RaMon | 145.4 | I(EFE+SID0) | | | Good | | | | | | | | |
Start 10:10
polarity now correct
Wiederholung von vorher, aber keine Aufnahme von neuen Waveforms
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.100 V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x = 8
y = 68 |
|
85
|
Sat Feb 27 18:38:09 2021 |
Felix Ulrich-Pur | Waveforms SiC+Si | 11 | SiC+Si+RaMon | 62.4 | I(EFE+SID0) | | | Good | | | | | | | | |
Start 10:24
polarity now correct
no signal in sic --> energy too low due to scintis
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.100 V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x = 8
y = 68 |
|
86
|
Sat Feb 27 18:38:54 2021 |
Felix Ulrich-Pur | Waveforms SiC+Si | 12 | SiC+Si+RaMon | 252.7 | I(EFE+SID0) | | | Good | | | | | | | | |
Start 10:28
polarity now correct
now signal in SiC
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.100 V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x = 8
y = 68 |
|
87
|
Sat Feb 27 18:42:13 2021 |
Felix Ulrich-Pur | Waveforms SiC+Si | 13 | SiC+Si+RaMon | 252.7 | III(EFE+SID2) | | | Good | | | | | | | | |
Start 10:38
no signal in SiC
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.100 V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x = 8
y = 68 |