ID |
Date |
Author |
Subject |
DUT |
Beam Energy |
Beam Setting |
Run Number |
Events |
PhantomType |
PhantomAngle |
2
|
Sat Jul 13 13:32:30 2019 |
Thomas Bergauer | 2019-07-13f proton CT | DSSD-Tracker | | EFE, QuadScan SID2 | 1 | | none | | Trigger: Coincidence using Scintillators
timing setting 41 (*32ns)
using 16ns cables from our scintialltors to TLU |
47
|
Fri Oct 25 18:09:21 2019 |
Alexander Burker | 2019-10-20 Low Flux | | 800 | EFE 1us, Degrader10, changed gain orb, gain 6, betatron10, no chopper | 1 | 22743 | none | | 06:25
WRONG GAIN ON THE ORB
tracker was not properly configured at the beginning, but now is working
many empty spills
 
|
78
|
Fri Oct 25 23:04:42 2019 |
Alexander Burker | 2019-10-25 Low Flux | | 800 | EFE 10, Betatron 10 %, Chopper 60 %, Degrader 20, Orb Gain 6 dB | 1 | 33784 | none | |  
|
1
|
Sat Jul 13 12:14:55 2019 |
Thomas Bergauer | | Drehtisch | | | | | | | Settings |
12
|
Sat Jul 13 18:42:24 2019 |
Alexander Burker | 2019-07-13f proton CT | Sketch | | pCT Setup | | | | | Big Line: DSSD
Small Line: Malta
Small Square: Phantom
Small Rectangle: Trigger Scintillator
Big Rectangle: TERA
Beam is coming in from Left to Right |
13
|
Sat Jul 13 18:52:33 2019 |
Alexander Burker | 2019-07-13f proton CT | Sketch | | TERA Calibration Setup | | | | | |
16
|
Sat Jul 13 20:17:38 2019 |
Felix Ulrich-Pur | | TERA-Cal | 800 | | | | none | | Calibrated Voltage settings
P Voltage: 69V
Q Voltage: 76,8V
R Voltage: 68,65V
S Voltage: 68,9 V |
46
|
Tue Sep 24 11:12:45 2019 |
Alexander Burker | | Sketch | | | | | | | Notes of the planned order of modules within beam (and reserve modules), before switching out the first one |
76
|
Fri Oct 25 18:50:08 2019 |
Alexander Burker | 2019-10-20 Low Flux | Sketch | | | | | | | Spot Sizes Table: SpotsForBeamSettings.csv
Empirics, such as P2, P25, Median, P75 and P98 were obtained directly from the data. These may not be accurate if the beam is larger than the sensor.
To better describe these cases, fit values were obtained with a curve fit to a normal distribution. This can also be inaccurate, as many beam settings aren't normal and the automatic fit might have failed. A goodness-of-fit will be added to each row in the distant future |
77
|
Fri Oct 25 18:56:11 2019 |
Alexander Burker | 2019-07-13f proton CT | Sketch | | | | | none | | Spot sizes table: SpotsForBeamSettings.csv
Empirics, such as P2, P25, Median, P75 and P98 were obtained directly from the data. These may not be accurate if the beam is larger than the sensor.
To better describe these cases, fit values were obtained with a curve fit to a normal distribution. This can also be inaccurate, as many beam settings aren't normal and the automatic fit might have failed. A goodness-of-fit will be added to each row in the distant future |
100
|
Tue Nov 5 10:50:08 2019 |
Florian Pitters | LGAD Setups on 20. and 25.10. Shift | LGAD | | | | | | | Setup 1 (on 20.10.2019):
-
With Cividec
-
Position: beam center, ch3 (diode 1) in front, ch4 (diode 3) in the rear
-
RMS: ca. 23 mV, 24 mV
-
Trigger on Ch3: ca. 250 mV
-
Osci amplitude/div: 200 mV or 800 MeV, 400 mV for lower energies
Setup 2 (on 20.10.2019):
Setup 3 (on 25.10.2019):
Setup 4 (on 25.10.2019):
|
101
|
Fri Nov 22 10:52:45 2019 |
Alexander Burker | 2019-11-23f proton CT | Sketch | | pCT Setup | | | | | Sketch of the setup for experiment 3, proton CT |
|