Home CMS Production Clean room MedAustron HEPHY testbeams old
electronics module assembly SiDDaTA
  HEPHY logbook of the Electronics Group, Page 1 of 4  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Author Project Measurement Type Object ID Subjectdown
  3   Wed Apr 23 13:05:05 2008 Christian IrmlerSPS Testbeam June08sourcehybrid 01time correlation between TDC and sensor measurement -> 3.1 ns RMS
Attachment 1: vie_run001_tpeak_vs_TDC.gif
vie_run001_tpeak_vs_TDC.gif
  17   Sun Jul 4 05:48:36 2010 Christian IrmlerBELLE UpgradesourceOrigami 6 - module 1run002: first analysis results

Run name: run002

Run type: 0 (Hardware (Normal Run))
Comments:
After ~40min warmup
HV=80
90Sr 1mCi source - moved compared to run001
multi6

Max. Events=100000      Trg delay=25

Origami 6 module #1
w/o cooling
sensor: B2HPK_10938-9239_8

n-side: all 4 APVs read out
p-side: APV #0 to #3  read out, analog output of #4 and #5 were not connected to FADC board

 

 

Attachment 1: run002_cluster_sum.txt
Analysis of run002

Peak Mode, 3 x 200 initevents (first 10 skipped) + 99400 events
Number hybrids:  2	number zones:  2	 number sensors:  1
Using calibration file intcal001
No pedestal correction file
Seed/Neighbor/Cluster/Noisy Strips Cuts [RMS noise]: 5.0/3.0/5.0
Min. hitlength:   3


Comments:
After ~40min warmup
HV=80
90Sr 1mCi source - moved compared to run001
multi6



Analysis date: 04.07.2010 05:40:47


Analysis settings:
 runname: run002_cluster
 clock: 40.00 MHz
 datafilepath: ./
 outputpath: ./
 subevents:  6
 fitmode: 2 (cal. fit)
 options: hr




Results:

ModuleName           ZoneType    Ch    OKCh     OK%   Entries    MClW    MPSignal   Noise   MPSNR   HpSE  Occup SigSlop SigInt SigRes PtiSlop PtiInt  PtiRes ClwSlop ClwInt  ClwRes
Origami6_mod1_p   Orgami 6"    512    512   100.0     34659    1.87    24436.5   3330.4    6.74   0.25   0.80   0.95   0.00  6651.0   1.00   -17.63   7.47    1.00    0.21   0.86
Origami6_mod1_n   Orgami 6"    512    508    99.2     95601    1.93    23801.7    962.7   17.08   1.02   0.79   0.95   0.00  6651.0   1.00   -17.63   7.47    1.00    0.21   0.86




Attachment 2: run002_cluster_noi_0.ps
run002_cluster_noi_0.ps
Attachment 3: run002_cluster_sig_0.ps
run002_cluster_sig_0.ps
Attachment 4: run002_cluster_hit_0.ps
run002_cluster_hit_0.ps
Attachment 5: run002_cluster_hpt_0.ps
run002_cluster_hpt_0.ps
Attachment 6: run002_cluster_clw_0.ps
run002_cluster_clw_0.ps
Attachment 7: run002_cluster_cor_0.ps
run002_cluster_cor_0.ps
  6   Wed May 7 15:24:49 2008 Christian IrmlerSPS Testbeam June08modulemodule 10/02properties (noise, intcal), APVs bonded to the sensor
Module tested with 1 and 2 rows bonded to the sensor, respectively. HV = 100 V Ibias (100V) = 19.1 nA Ibias (200V) = 23.7 nA
Attachment 1: modul1002_1row_cal_apv0.png
modul1002_1row_cal_apv0.png
Attachment 2: modul1002_1row_cal_apv1.png
modul1002_1row_cal_apv1.png
Attachment 3: modul1002_1row_cmnoise_apv0.png
modul1002_1row_cmnoise_apv0.png
Attachment 4: modul1002_1row_cmnoise_apv1.png
modul1002_1row_cmnoise_apv1.png
Attachment 5: modul1002_1row_pednoise_apv0.png
modul1002_1row_pednoise_apv0.png
Attachment 6: modul1002_1row_pednoise_apv1.png
modul1002_1row_pednoise_apv1.png
Attachment 7: modul1002_final_cal_apv0.png
modul1002_final_cal_apv0.png
Attachment 8: modul1002_final_cal_apv1.png
modul1002_final_cal_apv1.png
Attachment 9: modul1002_final_cmnoise_apv0.png
modul1002_final_cmnoise_apv0.png
Attachment 10: modul1002_final_cmnoise_apv1.png
modul1002_final_cmnoise_apv1.png
Attachment 11: modul1002_final_pednoise_apv0.png
modul1002_final_pednoise_apv0.png
Attachment 12: modul1002_final_pednoise_apv1.png
modul1002_final_pednoise_apv1.png
  9   Wed May 7 15:26:24 2008 Christian IrmlerSPS Testbeam June08modulemodule 20/09properties (noise, intcal), APVs bonded to the sensor
Module tested with 1 and 2 rows bonded to the sensor, respectively. HV = 100 V Ibias (100 V) = 25.1 nA Ibias (200 V) = 31.4 nA
Attachment 1: modul2009_1row_cal_apv0.png
modul2009_1row_cal_apv0.png
Attachment 2: modul2009_1row_cal_apv1.png
modul2009_1row_cal_apv1.png
Attachment 3: modul2009_1row_cmnoise_apv0.png
modul2009_1row_cmnoise_apv0.png
Attachment 4: modul2009_1row_cmnoise_apv1.png
modul2009_1row_cmnoise_apv1.png
Attachment 5: modul2009_1row_pednoise_apv0.png
modul2009_1row_pednoise_apv0.png
Attachment 6: modul2009_1row_pednoise_apv1.png
modul2009_1row_pednoise_apv1.png
Attachment 7: modul2009_final_cal_apv0.png
modul2009_final_cal_apv0.png
Attachment 8: modul2009_final_cal_apv1.png
modul2009_final_cal_apv1.png
Attachment 9: modul2009_final_cmnoise_apv0.png
modul2009_final_cmnoise_apv0.png
Attachment 10: modul2009_final_cmnoise_apv1.png
modul2009_final_cmnoise_apv1.png
Attachment 11: modul2009_final_pednoise_apv0.png
modul2009_final_pednoise_apv0.png
Attachment 12: modul2009_final_pednoise_apv1.png
modul2009_final_pednoise_apv1.png
  8   Wed May 7 15:40:07 2008 Christian IrmlerSPS Testbeam June08modulemodule 07/07properties (noise, intcal), APVs bonded to the sensor
Module tested with 1 and 2 rows bonded to the sensor, respectively. HV = 100 V Ibias (100 V) = 20.2 nA Ibias (200 V) = 21.9 nA
Attachment 1: modul0707_1row_cal_apv0.png
modul0707_1row_cal_apv0.png
Attachment 2: modul0707_1row_cal_apv1.png
modul0707_1row_cal_apv1.png
Attachment 3: modul0707_1row_cmnoise_apv0.png
modul0707_1row_cmnoise_apv0.png
Attachment 4: modul0707_1row_cmnoise_apv1.png
modul0707_1row_cmnoise_apv1.png
Attachment 5: modul0707_1row_pednoise_apv0.png
modul0707_1row_pednoise_apv0.png
Attachment 6: modul0707_1row_pednoise_apv1.png
modul0707_1row_pednoise_apv1.png
Attachment 7: modul0707_final_cal_apv0.png
modul0707_final_cal_apv0.png
Attachment 8: modul0707_final_cal_apv1.png
modul0707_final_cal_apv1.png
Attachment 9: modul0707_final_cmnoise_apv0.png
modul0707_final_cmnoise_apv0.png
Attachment 10: modul0707_final_cmnoise_apv1.png
modul0707_final_cmnoise_apv1.png
Attachment 11: modul0707_final_pednoise_apv0.png
modul0707_final_pednoise_apv0.png
Attachment 12: modul0707_final_pednoise_apv1.png
modul0707_final_pednoise_apv1.png
  7   Wed May 7 16:12:58 2008 Christian IrmlerSPS Testbeam June08modulemodule 12/08properties (noise, intcal), APVs bonded to the sensor
Module tested with 1 and 2 rows bonded to the sensor, respectively. HV = 100 V Ibias (100 V) = 22.2 nA Ibias (200 V) = 26.5 nA
Attachment 1: modul1208_1row_cal_apv0.png
modul1208_1row_cal_apv0.png
Attachment 2: modul0707_1row_cal_apv1.png
modul0707_1row_cal_apv1.png
Attachment 3: modul0707_1row_cmnoise_apv0.png
modul0707_1row_cmnoise_apv0.png
Attachment 4: modul0707_1row_cmnoise_apv1.png
modul0707_1row_cmnoise_apv1.png
Attachment 5: modul0707_1row_pednoise_apv0.png
modul0707_1row_pednoise_apv0.png
Attachment 6: modul0707_1row_pednoise_apv1.png
modul0707_1row_pednoise_apv1.png
Attachment 7: modul0707_final_cal_apv0.png
modul0707_final_cal_apv0.png
Attachment 8: modul0707_final_cal_apv1.png
modul0707_final_cal_apv1.png
Attachment 9: modul0707_final_cmnoise_apv0.png
modul0707_final_cmnoise_apv0.png
Attachment 10: modul0707_final_cmnoise_apv1.png
modul0707_final_cmnoise_apv1.png
Attachment 11: modul0707_final_pednoise_apv0.png
modul0707_final_pednoise_apv0.png
Attachment 12: modul0707_final_pednoise_apv1.png
modul0707_final_pednoise_apv1.png
  10   Wed May 7 19:05:08 2008 Christian IrmlerSPS Testbeam June08modulemodule 04/04properties (noise, intcal), APVs bonded to the sensor
Module tested with 1 and 2 rows bonded to the sensor, respectively. HV = 100 V Ibias (100 V) = 27.8 nA Ibias (200 V) = 32.7 nA
Attachment 1: modul0404_1row_cal_apv0.png
modul0404_1row_cal_apv0.png
Attachment 2: modul0404_1row_cal_apv1.png
modul0404_1row_cal_apv1.png
Attachment 3: modul0404_1row_cmnoise_apv0.png
modul0404_1row_cmnoise_apv0.png
Attachment 4: modul0404_1row_cmnoise_apv1.png
modul0404_1row_cmnoise_apv1.png
Attachment 5: modul0404_1row_pednoise_apv0.png
modul0404_1row_pednoise_apv0.png
Attachment 6: modul0404_1row_pednoise_apv1.png
modul0404_1row_pednoise_apv1.png
Attachment 7: modul0404_final_cal_apv0.png
modul0404_final_cal_apv0.png
Attachment 8: modul0404_final_cal_apv1.png
modul0404_final_cal_apv1.png
Attachment 9: modul0404_final_cmnoise_apv0.png
modul0404_final_cmnoise_apv0.png
Attachment 10: modul0404_final_cmnoise_apv1.png
modul0404_final_cmnoise_apv1.png
Attachment 11: modul0404_final_pednoise_apv0.png
modul0404_final_pednoise_apv0.png
Attachment 12: modul0404_final_pednoise_apv1.png
modul0404_final_pednoise_apv1.png
  11   Fri May 9 09:56:15 2008 Christian IrmlerSPS Testbeam June08modulemodule 06/03properties (noise, intcal), APVs bonded to the sensor
Module tested with 1 and 2 rows bonded to the sensor, respectively. HV = 100 V Ibias (100 V) = 26.5 nA Ibias (200 V) = 37.8 nA
Attachment 1: modul0603_1row_cal_apv0.png
modul0603_1row_cal_apv0.png
Attachment 2: modul0603_1row_cal_apv1.png
modul0603_1row_cal_apv1.png
Attachment 3: modul0603_1row_cmnoise_apv0.png
modul0603_1row_cmnoise_apv0.png
Attachment 4: modul0603_1row_cmnoise_apv1.png
modul0603_1row_cmnoise_apv1.png
Attachment 5: modul0603_1row_pednoise_apv0.png
modul0603_1row_pednoise_apv0.png
Attachment 6: modul0603_1row_pednoise_apv1.png
modul0603_1row_pednoise_apv1.png
Attachment 7: modul0603_final_cal_apv0.png
modul0603_final_cal_apv0.png
Attachment 8: modul0603_final_cal_apv1.png
modul0603_final_cal_apv1.png
Attachment 9: modul0603_final_cmnoise_apv0.png
modul0603_final_cmnoise_apv0.png
Attachment 10: modul0603_final_cmnoise_apv1.png
modul0603_final_cmnoise_apv1.png
Attachment 11: modul0603_final_pednoise_apv0.png
modul0603_final_pednoise_apv0.png
Attachment 12: modul0603_final_pednoise_apv1.png
modul0603_final_pednoise_apv1.png
  12   Fri May 9 10:00:34 2008 Christian IrmlerSPS Testbeam June08modulemodule 03/10properties (noise, intcal), APVs bonded to the sensor
Module tested with 1 and 2 rows bonded to the sensor, respectively. HV = 100 V Ibias (100 V) = 18.9 nA Ibias (200 V) = 25.5 nA
Attachment 1: modul0310_1row_cal_apv0.png
modul0310_1row_cal_apv0.png
Attachment 2: modul0310_1row_cal_apv1.png
modul0310_1row_cal_apv1.png
Attachment 3: modul0310_1row_cmnoise_apv0.png
modul0310_1row_cmnoise_apv0.png
Attachment 4: modul0310_1row_cmnoise_apv1.png
modul0310_1row_cmnoise_apv1.png
Attachment 5: modul0310_1row_pednoise_apv0.png
modul0310_1row_pednoise_apv0.png
Attachment 6: modul0310_1row_pednoise_apv1.png
modul0310_1row_pednoise_apv1.png
Attachment 7: modul0310_final_cal_apv0.png
modul0310_final_cal_apv0.png
Attachment 8: modul0310_final_cal_apv1.png
modul0310_final_cal_apv1.png
Attachment 9: modul0310_final_cmnoise_apv0.png
modul0310_final_cmnoise_apv0.png
Attachment 10: modul0310_final_cmnoise_apv1.png
modul0310_final_cmnoise_apv1.png
Attachment 11: modul0310_final_pednoise_apv0.png
modul0310_final_pednoise_apv0.png
Attachment 12: modul0310_final_pednoise_apv1.png
modul0310_final_pednoise_apv1.png
  13   Fri May 9 10:04:26 2008 Christian IrmlerSPS Testbeam June08modulemodule 05/05properties (noise, intcal), APVs bonded to the sensor
Module tested with 1 and 2 rows bonded to the sensor, respectively. HV = 100 V Ibias (100 V) = 18.0 nA Ibias (200 V) = 23.6 nA
Attachment 1: modul0505_1row_cal_apv0.png
modul0505_1row_cal_apv0.png
Attachment 2: modul0505_1row_cal_apv1.png
modul0505_1row_cal_apv1.png
Attachment 3: modul0505_1row_cmnoise_apv0.png
modul0505_1row_cmnoise_apv0.png
Attachment 4: modul0505_1row_cmnoise_apv1.png
modul0505_1row_cmnoise_apv1.png
Attachment 5: modul0505_1row_pednoise_apv0.png
modul0505_1row_pednoise_apv0.png
Attachment 6: modul0505_1row_pednoise_apv1.png
modul0505_1row_pednoise_apv1.png
Attachment 7: modul0505_final_cal_apv0.png
modul0505_final_cal_apv0.png
Attachment 8: modul0505_final_cal_apv1.png
modul0505_final_cal_apv1.png
Attachment 9: modul0505_final_cmnoise_apv0.png
modul0505_final_cmnoise_apv0.png
Attachment 10: modul0505_final_cmnoise_apv1.png
modul0505_final_cmnoise_apv1.png
Attachment 11: modul0505_final_pednoise_apv0.png
modul0505_final_pednoise_apv0.png
Attachment 12: modul0505_final_pednoise_apv1.png
modul0505_final_pednoise_apv1.png
  5   Wed Apr 30 16:52:17 2008 Markus FriedlBELLE Upgrademodulemicronmicron sensor glued to frame
soeben haben wir den micron-DSSD (double metal layer) in den 2-teiligen rahmen geklebt und auf beiden seiten
temporäre kapton-stückerln aufgeklebt, über die bias appliziert werden kann. nach trocknung und bonden der
bias-verbindungen (montag, 5.5.2008) wird dieser für sensor-tests zur verfügung stehen.
  15   Wed Oct 7 14:23:35 2009 Dieter UhlBELLE Upgradehybrid#4hybrid-pitchadapter

opens at upper coat

pitchadapter4_upper_coat_opens.gif

 

shorts at upper coat

pitchadapter4_upper_coat.gif

 

opens at lower coat

pitchadapter4_lower_coat_opens.gif

 

shorts at lower coat

pitchadapter4_lower_coat.gif

  16   Wed Oct 7 14:24:06 2009 Dieter UhlBELLE Upgradehybrid#5hybrid-pitchadapter

shorts at upper coat

pitchadapter5_upper_coat.gif

 

opens at upper coat

pitchadapter5_upper_coat_opens.gif

 

shorts at lower coat

pitchadapter5_lower_coat.gif

 

opens at lower coat

pitchadapter5_lower_coat_opens.gif

  4   Wed Apr 23 13:37:18 2008 Markus FriedlSPS Testbeam June08sourcehybrid 01analysis results of source test
Ignore the "KEK November 2007" title - that's a legacy and is already changed :-)

As of now, there is no distinction in 16 separate zones. However, the gaps between the the zones are clearly visible in the Hit Profile, as the edge strips on both sides have a larger sensitive area and thus collect more hits than other strips; hence the spikes in the (otherwise pretty gaussian) beam profile. There is a single strip with no entries in the center - that's the one that suffered from the bias bond repair action.
SNR=21 (peak mode) is pretty healthy and fits to similar detectors operated with APV25.
All data was taken in multi-peak mode with subsequent hit fitting to obtain amplitude and timing (see separate posting for timing precision).

The verbose output of the analysis is pasted below.


Analysis of vie_run001

Peak Mode, 3 x 200 initevents (first 10 skipped) + 99400 events
Number hybrids:  1	number zones:  2	 number sensors:  1
Using calibration file vie_cal001
No pedestal correction file
Seed/Neighbor/Cluster/Noisy Strips Cuts [RMS noise]: 5.0/3.0/5.0
Min. hitlength:   3


Comments:
SILC module 01
HV=100V, 40MHz, Tp=50ns, 30ns
Sr90 1mCi ,  black cloth cover



Analysis date: 23.04.2008 13:25:09


Analysis settings:
 runname: vie_run001_cluster
 clock: 40.00 MHz
 datafilepath: data/
 outputpath: output/
 subevents:  6
 fitmode: 2 (cal. fit)
 options: h




Results:

ModuleName           ZoneType    Ch    OKCh     OK%   Entries    MClW    MPSignal   Noise   MPSNR   HpSE  Occup
p_side            JP single sensor    256    256   100.0     90385    2.53    21546.1    729.4   20.68   0.53   1.81
Attachment 1: vie_run001_cluster_sig_0.gif
vie_run001_cluster_sig_0.gif
Attachment 2: vie_run001_cluster_noi_0.gif
vie_run001_cluster_noi_0.gif
Attachment 3: vie_run001_cluster_hit_0.gif
vie_run001_cluster_hit_0.gif
Attachment 4: vie_run001_cluster_clw_0.gif
vie_run001_cluster_clw_0.gif
  14   Tue May 20 14:27:50 2008 Markus FriedlBELLE Upgradesourcemicronanalysis results of source test
*** NOTE: AFTER THIS MEASUREMENT WE REALIZED THAT BIASING WAS NOT DONE PROPERLY
          HENCE THE RESULTS BELOW ARE NOT RELIABLE 
          (in fact it is surprising that they are not worse) ***


Please find the results of the lab source test on the new Micron module here.
It is read out with 3 + 3 APV chips on either side.

Results table of the source measurement:
                      p-side     n-side
 Cluster signal [e]    18361      19434
 Strip noise [e]        1142       1193
 Avg cluster width      1.91       1.30
 Single strip SNR       16.1       16.3
 Cluster SNR            11.6       14.3
 Strip pitch [um]       50.0      153.5     

Apparently, the double metal capacitance is not so bad as expected, even though the Micron sensor does not use
the hourglass crossing scheme. Presumably the dielectric between metal 1 and 2 is rather thick (several um).
Strip noise is roughly the same on both p and n side, so the difference in Cluster SNR (*) only stems from the
unequal cluster width (which is a result of the different pitches).

Peak time precision vs SNR (last plot below) is worse compared to the values obtained with various HPK sensors
in the November 2007 beam test at KEK. However, this is a comparison of source and beam and thus might not be
significant. Let's see what we will get in the SPS beam test next week.

(*) Cluster SNR := sum(signal) / (strip_noise * sqrt(cluster_width) )
Attachment 1: vie_micron_run002_signal.gif
vie_micron_run002_signal.gif
Attachment 2: vie_micron_run002_noise.gif
vie_micron_run002_noise.gif
Attachment 3: vie_micron_run002_hit.gif
vie_micron_run002_hit.gif
Attachment 4: vie_micron_run002_clw.gif
vie_micron_run002_clw.gif
Attachment 5: vie_micron_p_run002_tres.gif
vie_micron_p_run002_tres.gif
Attachment 6: vie_micron_n_run002_tres.gif
vie_micron_n_run002_tres.gif
Attachment 7: vie_micron_p_run002_ressnr.gif
vie_micron_p_run002_ressnr.gif
Attachment 8: vie_micron_n_run002_ressnr.gif
vie_micron_n_run002_ressnr.gif
Attachment 9: trms_vs_snr_micron_src.gif
trms_vs_snr_micron_src.gif
Entry is currently edited by Hao Yin on 255.255.255.255    50   Fri May 29 11:47:56 2015 Hao YinBelle IIsystemPS FilterTesting PS LV filter and quantifying the required min noise lvl

Data of this entry is recorded in the folder: LV315kHz_Injections
Injecting noise to LV with a freq. of 314 kHz to emulate Caen PS with KenWood PS.

Run Name 315kHzKenWood_: (injecting cmc noise into p-side lv) (attachment 1)
000 ... baseline noise
001 ... 4mA
002 ... 1mA
003 ... 1mA wo Amplifier
004 ... 4mA wo Amplifier
005 ... 0.5mA wo Amplifier
006 ... 2mA wo Amplifier
007 ... 0.2mA wo Amplifier

Run Name 315kHzKenWood_Filter_BW_: (injecting cmc noise into p-side lv with filters (inductance with 470 mH x 6 ) conn. at bw) (attachment 1) (wo Amplifier)
000 ... baseline noise
001 ... 0.2mA
002 ... 0.4mA
003 ... 0.5mA
004 ... 1mA
005 ... 2mA
006 ... 4mA

Run Name 315kHzKenWood_Filer_BW_HVRET-GND:
000 ... baseline noise
001 ... 0.2mA
002 ... 0.4mA
 

  35   Thu Jun 5 10:34:29 2014 Benedikt WürknerBelle IIsourceSilc ModuleSilc Angle Measurement 7°

Measured the Silc 03/10 Module using the Sr90 Source to have a comparison for the Eta-Distribution at different angles. 

Data can be found on heros in: /home/medialib/LAB_Silc_Angle. 

Plots made with TuxOA for all different regions can be found in /home/users/bwuerkner/plots/. 

 

  34   Thu Jun 5 10:34:06 2014 Benedikt WürknerBelle IIsourceSilc ModuleSilc Angle Measurement 4°

Measured the Silc 03/10 Module using the Sr90 Source to have a comparison for the Eta-Distribution at different angles. 

Data can be found on heros in: /home/medialib/LAB_Silc_Angle. 

Plots made with TuxOA for all different regions can be found in /home/users/bwuerkner/plots/. 

 

  33   Thu Jun 5 10:33:46 2014 Benedikt WürknerBelle IIsourceSilc ModuleSilc Angle Measurement 1°

Measured the Silc 03/10 Module using the Sr90 Source to have a comparison for the Eta-Distribution at different angles. 

Data can be found on heros in: /home/medialib/LAB_Silc_Angle. 

Plots made with TuxOA for all different regions can be found in /home/users/bwuerkner/plots/. 

 

  36   Thu Jun 5 10:34:45 2014 Benedikt WürknerBelle IIsourceSilc ModuleSilc Angle Measurement 10°

Measured the Silc 03/10 Module using the Sr90 Source to have a comparison for the Eta-Distribution at different angles. 

Data can be found on heros in: /home/medialib/LAB_Silc_Angle. 

Plots made with TuxOA for all different regions can be found in /home/users/bwuerkner/plots/. 

 

ELOG V3.1.4-966e3dd