before run, setups had to be aligned (first slab in slabholder was put in isocentre. However, in this run, no slab was used). Room was closed at 08:10

Beam->Nozzle-> Slabholder->TOF-CAL (TRB)-> DOGMA Setup(Diamond+LGADs)-> RaMon

TRB Setup: 260V bias and 250mA pre-amps, threshold 1000

measured 400kHz with Ramon and only 100kHz with LGADs (third LGAD) and 60kHz accepted trrigger rate

beam was shifted vertically by x? cm? (need to lookup again). So TRB setup was shifted with motors such that the He beam was hitting the centre of the LGADs

wrong energy don't use

Low flux carbon did not work

5µs EFE, 10s Extraction, Deg100
we tried different energies (402.MeV/u)-> 238 MeV/u, but unfortunately we did not get any beam

3 cm plastic water (in isocentre)
2.6 Mhz on Ramon (after 5 Layers of Silicon and close to second iso centre) and 400 kHz on LGAD

WET measurement

Low flux carbon did not work

1µs EFE, 30s Extraction, Deg100
we tried different energies (402.MeV/u)-> 120 MeV/u, but unfortunately we did not get any beam

3 cm plastic water (in isocentre)
4.3 Mhz on Ramon (after 5 Layers of Silicon and close to second iso centre) and 1MHz on LGAD

WET measurement

Mean rate per spill~ 5Ee6 p/s (online estimation without proper analysis)

2cm plastic water (in isocentre)
3.2 Mhz on Ramon (after 5 Layers of Silicon and close to second iso centre) and 600 kHz on LGAD

WET measurement

Mean rate per spill~ 4Ee6 p/s (online estimation without proper analysis)

2cm plastic water (in isocentre)
5 Mhz on Ramon (after 5 Layers of Silicon and close to second iso centre) and 1.2 MHz on LGAD

WET measurement

Mean rate per spill~ 6Ee6 p/s (online estimation without proper analysis)

1cm plastic water (in isocentre)
4 Mhz on Ramon (after 5 Layers of Silicon and close to second iso centre) and 700 kHz on LGAD

WET measurement

Mean rate per spill~ 4Ee6 p/s (online estimation without proper analysis)