| ID |
Date |
Author |
Subject |
Run Number |
DUT |
Beam Energy |
Rate Setting |
Particle Type |
Events |
Data |
Beam Betatron |
Beam Chopper |
Beam Degrader |
Beam EFE |
Beam Orb |
Beam QuadScan |
PhantomType |
PhantomAngle |
|
206
|
Tue Mar 16 15:32:48 2021 |
Patrick Sieberer | SiC strip sensor | 69 | SiC+DSSD tracker | 62.4 | II(BETA+EFE) | Proton | | Crap | | | | | | | | |
Testrun for Beam
Ripple Filter jumping around |
|
207
|
Tue Mar 16 15:33:23 2021 |
Patrick Sieberer | SiC strip sensor | 70 | SiC+DSSD tracker | 62.4 | II(BETA+EFE) | Proton | 1.1M | Good | | | | | | | | |
Energy Scan
00:21
Filter vermutlich draussen |
|
208
|
Tue Mar 16 15:34:25 2021 |
Patrick Sieberer | SiC strip sensor | 71 | SiC+DSSD tracker | 100.4 | II(BETA+EFE) | Proton | 1.2M | Good | | | | | | | | |
Energy Scan
00:46
Filter vermutlich draussen |
|
209
|
Tue Mar 16 15:34:50 2021 |
Patrick Sieberer | SiC strip sensor | 72 | SiC+DSSD tracker | 83 | II(BETA+EFE) | Proton | 1.2M | Good | | | | | | | | |
Energy Scan
01:10
Filter vermutlich draussen |
|
210
|
Tue Mar 16 15:35:10 2021 |
Patrick Sieberer | SiC strip sensor | 73 | SiC+DSSD tracker | 145.4 | II(BETA+EFE) | Proton | 1M | Good | | | | | | | | |
Energy Scan
01:35
Filter vermutlich draussen |
|
211
|
Tue Mar 16 15:35:35 2021 |
Patrick Sieberer | SiC strip sensor | 74 | SiC+DSSD tracker | 252.7 | II(BETA+EFE) | Proton | 3M | Good | | | | | | | | |
Energy Scan
01:54
Filter vermutlich draussen |
|
212
|
Tue Mar 16 15:35:59 2021 |
Patrick Sieberer | SiC strip sensor | 75 | SiC+DSSD tracker | 800 | V | Proton | 400k | Good | | | | | | | | |
Energy Scan
02:48
1-6M Hz! |
|
213
|
Tue Mar 16 15:37:05 2021 |
Patrick Sieberer | SiC strip sensor | 76 | SiC+DSSD tracker | 800 | VI | Proton | | Crap | | | | | | | | |
Energy Scan
03:02
4Hz, VII -> MHz ? |
|
214
|
Tue Mar 16 15:37:49 2021 |
Patrick Sieberer | SiC strip sensor | 77 | SiC+DSSD tracker | 800 | V | Proton | 6.6M | Good | | | | | | | | |
Energy Scan
03:06-5:18
MHz Rate
Danach: Abbauen |
|
76
|
Sat Feb 27 09:26:27 2021 |
Felix Ulrich-Pur | Rate verification | 1 | SiC+Si+RaMon | 62.4 | III(EFE+SID2) | | | Unknown | | | | | | | | |
Start 06:37
rate looks okish. few emtpy spills
2021-02-27, 06:07:
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.475V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.112V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x: 0
y: 0
2021-02-27, 06:30:
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1
channel 2 unverändert
2021-02-27, 06:37:
Setting: 3
Run 1: 6:37 62.4 MeV, Rate geringer als erwartet
|
|
77
|
Sat Feb 27 09:28:07 2021 |
Felix Ulrich-Pur | Rate verification | 2 | SiC+Si+RaMon | 252.7 | III(EFE+SID2) | | | Crap | | | | | | | | |
Start 06:47
rate only 10Hz, stopped run, room request and rewired trigger.
NOTE: Problem was caused by operators: Optics were not set correctly after ramping up energy from 62.4 to 252.7, not trigger cable
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.475V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x: 0
y: 0 |
|
78
|
Sat Feb 27 09:29:41 2021 |
Felix Ulrich-Pur | Rate verification | 4 | SiC+Si+RaMon | 252.7 | III(EFE+SID2) | | | Good | | | | | | | | |
Start 06:55
reallocated correctly, rate looks similar to old measurements now (kHz ish)
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.475V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x: 0
y: 0 |
|
79
|
Sat Feb 27 09:30:32 2021 |
Felix Ulrich-Pur | Rate verification | 5 | SiC+Si+RaMon | 62.4 | III(EFE+SID2) | | | Good | | | | | | | | |
Start 07:03
verified if run 1 was reliable-->Same results
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.475V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x: 0
y: 0 |
|
80
|
Sat Feb 27 09:31:57 2021 |
Felix Ulrich-Pur | Rate verification | 6 | SiC+Si+RaMon | 252.7 | I(EFE+SID0) | | | Good | | | | | | | | |
Start 07:16
rate looks fine,
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.475V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x: 0
y: 0
SiC: man sieht erstmals Signale |
|
81
|
Sat Feb 27 09:40:15 2021 |
Felix Ulrich-Pur | Rate verification | 7 | SiC+Si+RaMon | 62.4 | I(EFE+SID0) | | | Good | | | | | | | | |
Start 07:40
rate looks fine, however operators mentioned, that CPD data might have been loaded incorrectly-->pause during run and reloaded (07:48), rate seems unchanged
channel 1 : Si upstream
channel 2: SiC downstream
400 V Bias
Referenz: 2.475V channel 2, 0-Level: 2.310V channel 2
Referenz: 2.477V channel 1, 0-Level: 2.315V channel 1
position:
x: 0
y: 0
|
|
312
|
Sat Oct 8 07:11:03 2022 |
Christian Irmler | Ramon only | 1 | RD50-MPW3 | 800 | | Proton | | Crap | lowflux high | | | | | | | |
|
|
311
|
Sat Oct 8 07:10:31 2022 |
Christian Irmler | RD50-MPW3 - First Testbeam | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tracker xml file: hvcmos_mpw3_20221008_TLU_00-000053.xml
|
|
285
|
Sun Nov 7 19:00:54 2021 |
Felix Ulrich-Pur | Peakfinder WET meas 7.11.21 | 13 | | 175.3 | nominal | | | Good | | | 10 | | | | none | |
Start: 08:30
WET measurement of PMMA slabs also used for TOF-CT (GSI)
coarse run (to find Bragg range |
|
286
|
Sun Nov 7 19:02:25 2021 |
Felix Ulrich-Pur | Peakfinder WET meas 7.11.21 | 14 | | 175.3 | nominal | | | Good | | | 10 | | | | none | |
Start: 08:55
WET measurement of PMMA slabs also used for TOF-CT (GSI)
reference run (with Arduino Spill Start/Stop logic)
fringes in Bragg peak (trigger not optimal (maybe too much latency with Arduino))--> next measurement with "Accumalte Charge" instead of "Spill Start/Stop" |
|
287
|
Sun Nov 7 19:04:10 2021 |
Felix Ulrich-Pur | Peakfinder WET meas 7.11.21 | 15 | | 175.3 | nominal | | | Good | | | 10 | | | | none | |
Start: 09:14
WET measurement of PMMA slabs also used for TOF-CT (GSI)
reference run
"Accumalte Charge" |