Home CMS Production Clean room MedAustron HEPHY testbeams old
testbeam-MA2018 testbeam-MA2019 testbeam-MA2020 testbeam-MA2021 testbeam-MA2023 testbeam-MA2024
  MedAustron 2019, Page 7 of 7  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Author Subject DUT Beam Energydown Beam Setting Run Number Events PhantomType PhantomAngle
  1   Sat Jul 13 12:14:55 2019 Thomas Bergauer Drehtisch      

Settings 

  2   Sat Jul 13 13:32:30 2019 Thomas Bergauer2019-07-13f proton CTDSSD-Tracker EFE, QuadScan SID21 none 

Trigger: Coincidence using Scintillators

timing setting 41 (*32ns)

using 16ns cables from our scintialltors to TLU

  12   Sat Jul 13 18:42:24 2019 Alexander Burker2019-07-13f proton CTSketch pCT Setup    

Big Line: DSSD
Small Line: Malta
Small Square: Phantom
Small Rectangle: Trigger Scintillator
Big Rectangle: TERA

Beam is coming in from Left to Right

  13   Sat Jul 13 18:52:33 2019 Alexander Burker2019-07-13f proton CTSketch TERA Calibration Setup    
  46   Tue Sep 24 11:12:45 2019 Alexander Burker Sketch      

Notes of the planned order of modules within beam (and reserve modules), before switching out the first one

  75   Fri Oct 25 18:45:20 2019 Alexander Burker2019-10-20 Low Flux   2922002none 

  76   Fri Oct 25 18:50:08 2019 Alexander Burker2019-10-20 Low FluxSketch      

Spot Sizes Table: SpotsForBeamSettings.csv

Empirics, such as P2, P25, Median, P75 and P98 were obtained directly from the data. These may not be accurate if the beam is larger than the sensor.

To better describe these cases, fit values were obtained with a curve fit to a normal distribution. This can also be inaccurate, as many beam settings aren't normal and the automatic fit might have failed. A goodness-of-fit will be added to each row in the distant future

  77   Fri Oct 25 18:56:11 2019 Alexander Burker2019-07-13f proton CTSketch    none 

Spot sizes table: SpotsForBeamSettings.csv

Empirics, such as P2, P25, Median, P75 and P98 were obtained directly from the data. These may not be accurate if the beam is larger than the sensor.

To better describe these cases, fit values were obtained with a curve fit to a normal distribution. This can also be inaccurate, as many beam settings aren't normal and the automatic fit might have failed. A goodness-of-fit will be added to each row in the distant future

  79   Sat Oct 26 00:36:35 2019 Alexander Burker2019-10-25 Low Flux   21132none 

  99   Tue Oct 29 14:13:20 2019 Alexander Burker 2019-10-25 Low Flux   36656none 

  100   Tue Nov 5 10:50:08 2019 Florian PittersLGAD Setups on 20. and 25.10. ShiftLGAD      

Setup 1 (on 20.10.2019):

  • With Cividec

  • Position: beam center, ch3 (diode 1) in front, ch4 (diode 3) in the rear

  • RMS: ca. 23 mV, 24 mV

  • Trigger on Ch3: ca. 250 mV

  • Osci amplitude/div: 200 mV or 800 MeV, 400 mV for lower energies

 

Setup 2 (on 20.10.2019):

  • Same as setup 1 but 1 cm to the top from beam center

 

Setup 3 (on 25.10.2019):

  • Same as setup 1 but with Osci amplitude/div: 1V

 

Setup 4 (on 25.10.2019):

  • No Cividec

  • Postion: Same as setup 1

  • RMS: ca. 0.3 mV, 0.3 mV

  • Trigger: 3 mV

  • Osci amplitude/div: 10 mV

  101   Fri Nov 22 10:52:45 2019 Alexander Burker2019-11-23f proton CTSketch pCT Setup    

Sketch of the setup for experiment 3, proton CT

ELOG V3.1.5-fc6679b