Home Clean room MedAustron HEPHY testbeams old
electronics module assembly SiDDaTA
  HEPHY logbook of the Electronics Group, Page 4 of 4  Not logged in ELOG logo
  ID Date Authorup Project Measurement Type Object ID Subject
  2   Tue Apr 22 19:34:09 2008 Markus FriedlSPS Testbeam June08modulehybrid 01Properties of hybrid 01, sensor fully bonded, HV=100V
HV bias glued to backplane, HV=100V
Attachment 1: hybrid01_sen_hv100V_cal_apv0.png
hybrid01_sen_hv100V_cal_apv0.png
Attachment 2: hybrid01_sen_hv100V_cal_apv1.png
hybrid01_sen_hv100V_cal_apv1.png
Attachment 3: hybrid01_sen_hv100V_pednoise_apv0.png
hybrid01_sen_hv100V_pednoise_apv0.png
Attachment 4: hybrid01_sen_hv100V_pednoise_apv1.png
hybrid01_sen_hv100V_pednoise_apv1.png
Attachment 5: hybrid01_sen_hv100V_cmnoise_apv0.png
hybrid01_sen_hv100V_cmnoise_apv0.png
Attachment 6: hybrid01_sen_hv100V_cmnoise_apv1.png
hybrid01_sen_hv100V_cmnoise_apv1.png
  4   Wed Apr 23 13:37:18 2008 Markus FriedlSPS Testbeam June08sourcehybrid 01analysis results of source test
Ignore the "KEK November 2007" title - that's a legacy and is already changed :-)

As of now, there is no distinction in 16 separate zones. However, the gaps between the the zones are clearly visible in the Hit Profile, as the edge strips on both sides have a larger sensitive area and thus collect more hits than other strips; hence the spikes in the (otherwise pretty gaussian) beam profile. There is a single strip with no entries in the center - that's the one that suffered from the bias bond repair action.
SNR=21 (peak mode) is pretty healthy and fits to similar detectors operated with APV25.
All data was taken in multi-peak mode with subsequent hit fitting to obtain amplitude and timing (see separate posting for timing precision).

The verbose output of the analysis is pasted below.


Analysis of vie_run001

Peak Mode, 3 x 200 initevents (first 10 skipped) + 99400 events
Number hybrids:  1	number zones:  2	 number sensors:  1
Using calibration file vie_cal001
No pedestal correction file
Seed/Neighbor/Cluster/Noisy Strips Cuts [RMS noise]: 5.0/3.0/5.0
Min. hitlength:   3


Comments:
SILC module 01
HV=100V, 40MHz, Tp=50ns, 30ns
Sr90 1mCi ,  black cloth cover



Analysis date: 23.04.2008 13:25:09


Analysis settings:
 runname: vie_run001_cluster
 clock: 40.00 MHz
 datafilepath: data/
 outputpath: output/
 subevents:  6
 fitmode: 2 (cal. fit)
 options: h




Results:

ModuleName           ZoneType    Ch    OKCh     OK%   Entries    MClW    MPSignal   Noise   MPSNR   HpSE  Occup
p_side            JP single sensor    256    256   100.0     90385    2.53    21546.1    729.4   20.68   0.53   1.81
Attachment 1: vie_run001_cluster_sig_0.gif
vie_run001_cluster_sig_0.gif
Attachment 2: vie_run001_cluster_noi_0.gif
vie_run001_cluster_noi_0.gif
Attachment 3: vie_run001_cluster_hit_0.gif
vie_run001_cluster_hit_0.gif
Attachment 4: vie_run001_cluster_clw_0.gif
vie_run001_cluster_clw_0.gif
  5   Wed Apr 30 16:52:17 2008 Markus FriedlBELLE Upgrademodulemicronmicron sensor glued to frame
soeben haben wir den micron-DSSD (double metal layer) in den 2-teiligen rahmen geklebt und auf beiden seiten
temporäre kapton-stückerln aufgeklebt, über die bias appliziert werden kann. nach trocknung und bonden der
bias-verbindungen (montag, 5.5.2008) wird dieser für sensor-tests zur verfügung stehen.
  14   Tue May 20 14:27:50 2008 Markus FriedlBELLE Upgradesourcemicronanalysis results of source test
*** NOTE: AFTER THIS MEASUREMENT WE REALIZED THAT BIASING WAS NOT DONE PROPERLY
          HENCE THE RESULTS BELOW ARE NOT RELIABLE 
          (in fact it is surprising that they are not worse) ***


Please find the results of the lab source test on the new Micron module here.
It is read out with 3 + 3 APV chips on either side.

Results table of the source measurement:
                      p-side     n-side
 Cluster signal [e]    18361      19434
 Strip noise [e]        1142       1193
 Avg cluster width      1.91       1.30
 Single strip SNR       16.1       16.3
 Cluster SNR            11.6       14.3
 Strip pitch [um]       50.0      153.5     

Apparently, the double metal capacitance is not so bad as expected, even though the Micron sensor does not use
the hourglass crossing scheme. Presumably the dielectric between metal 1 and 2 is rather thick (several um).
Strip noise is roughly the same on both p and n side, so the difference in Cluster SNR (*) only stems from the
unequal cluster width (which is a result of the different pitches).

Peak time precision vs SNR (last plot below) is worse compared to the values obtained with various HPK sensors
in the November 2007 beam test at KEK. However, this is a comparison of source and beam and thus might not be
significant. Let's see what we will get in the SPS beam test next week.

(*) Cluster SNR := sum(signal) / (strip_noise * sqrt(cluster_width) )
Attachment 1: vie_micron_run002_signal.gif
vie_micron_run002_signal.gif
Attachment 2: vie_micron_run002_noise.gif
vie_micron_run002_noise.gif
Attachment 3: vie_micron_run002_hit.gif
vie_micron_run002_hit.gif
Attachment 4: vie_micron_run002_clw.gif
vie_micron_run002_clw.gif
Attachment 5: vie_micron_p_run002_tres.gif
vie_micron_p_run002_tres.gif
Attachment 6: vie_micron_n_run002_tres.gif
vie_micron_n_run002_tres.gif
Attachment 7: vie_micron_p_run002_ressnr.gif
vie_micron_p_run002_ressnr.gif
Attachment 8: vie_micron_n_run002_ressnr.gif
vie_micron_n_run002_ressnr.gif
Attachment 9: trms_vs_snr_micron_src.gif
trms_vs_snr_micron_src.gif
ELOG V3.1.4-966e3dd