 Sat Dec 14 13:07:15 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Energy vs TOF calibration, 17, TOF-Cal GSI (TRB)+DOGMA setup(diamond+LGAD)+RaMon, 205.2 MeV/u, Low Flux Medium, Helium, Good, 08:46, 09:42, 56, , ,
|
before run, setups had to be aligned (first slab in slabholder was put in isocentre. However, in this run, no slab was used). Room was closed at 08:10
Beam->Nozzle-> Slabholder->TOF-CAL (TRB)-> DOGMA Setup(Diamond+LGADs)-> RaMon
TRB Setup: 260V bias and 250mA pre-amps, threshold 1000
measured 400kHz with Ramon and only 100kHz with LGADs (third LGAD) and 60kHz accepted trrigger rate
beam was shifted vertically by x? cm? (need to lookup again). So TRB setup was shifted with motors such that the He beam was hitting the centre of the LGADs |
|
Sun Jun 9 00:05:11 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, TOF CAL HADES LGADs WET Messung Wasser (wrong energy), 16, TOF-Cal GSI, 194.3 MeV, Low Flux High, Proton, Crap, 22:50, 22:52, , , ,
|
wrong energy don't use |
|
Sat Dec 14 13:04:57 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Shift 23.11.24 low flux Carbon test with RaMon (did not work), 16, RaMon, , Low Flux High, Carbon, Crap, 07:02, 07:20, 18, , ,
|
Low flux carbon did not work
5µs EFE, 10s Extraction, Deg100
we tried different energies (402.MeV/u)-> 238 MeV/u, but unfortunately we did not get any beam |
|
Sun Jun 9 00:04:23 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, TOF CAL HADES LGADs WET Messung Wasser, 15, TOF-Cal GSI, 194.3 MeV, Low Flux High, Proton, Good, 22:34, 22:50, , , ,
|
3 cm plastic water (in isocentre)
2.6 Mhz on Ramon (after 5 Layers of Silicon and close to second iso centre) and 400 kHz on LGAD
WET measurement |
|
Sat Dec 14 13:02:29 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Shift 23.11.24 low flux Carbon test with RaMon (did not work), 15, RaMon, , Low Flux High, Carbon, Crap, 06:55, 07:01, 6, , ,
|
Low flux carbon did not work
1µs EFE, 30s Extraction, Deg100
we tried different energies (402.MeV/u)-> 120 MeV/u, but unfortunately we did not get any beam |
|
Sat Jun 8 22:38:41 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, TOF CAL HADES LGADs WET Messung Wasser, 14, TOF-Cal GSI, 194.3 MeV, Low Flux High, Proton, Good, 22:19, 22.34, , , ,
|
3 cm plastic water (in isocentre)
4.3 Mhz on Ramon (after 5 Layers of Silicon and close to second iso centre) and 1MHz on LGAD
WET measurement |
|
Sat Dec 14 13:01:14 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Shift 23.11.24 low flux He test with RaMon, 14, RaMon, 63.3 MeV/u, Low Flux High, Helium, Good, 06:46, 06:46, 1, , ,
|
Mean rate per spill~ 5Ee6 p/s (online estimation without proper analysis) |
|
Sat Jun 8 22:12:06 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, TOF CAL HADES LGADs WET Messung Wasser, 13, TOF-Cal GSI, 145.4 MeV, Low Flux High, Proton, Good, 22:05, 22:34, , , ,
|
2cm plastic water (in isocentre)
3.2 Mhz on Ramon (after 5 Layers of Silicon and close to second iso centre) and 600 kHz on LGAD
WET measurement |
|
Sat Dec 14 13:00:26 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Shift 23.11.24 low flux He test with RaMon, 13, RaMon, 73.2 MeV/u, Low Flux High, Helium, Good, 06:44, 06:45, 1, , ,
|
Mean rate per spill~ 4Ee6 p/s (online estimation without proper analysis) |
|
Sat Jun 8 21:54:59 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, TOF CAL HADES LGADs WET Messung Wasser, 12, TOF-Cal GSI, 194.3 MeV, Low Flux High, Proton, Good, 21:53, 22:05, , , ,
|
2cm plastic water (in isocentre)
5 Mhz on Ramon (after 5 Layers of Silicon and close to second iso centre) and 1.2 MHz on LGAD
WET measurement |
|
Sat Dec 14 12:59:33 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Shift 23.11.24 low flux He test with RaMon, 12, RaMon, 97.2MeV/u, Low Flux High, Helium, Good, 06:43, 06:44, 1, , ,
|
Mean rate per spill~ 6Ee6 p/s (online estimation without proper analysis) |
|
Sat Jun 8 21:43:26 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, TOF CAL HADES LGADs WET Messung Wasser, 11, TOF-Cal GSI, 145.4 MeV, Low Flux High, Proton, Good, 21:39, 21:48, , , ,
|
1cm plastic water (in isocentre)
4 Mhz on Ramon (after 5 Layers of Silicon and close to second iso centre) and 700 kHz on LGAD
WET measurement |
|
Sat Dec 14 12:58:35 2024, Felix Ulrich-Pur, Shift 23.11.24 low flux He test with RaMon, 11, RaMon, 124.4 MeV/u, Low Flux High, Helium, Good, 06:43, 06:43, 1, , ,
|
Mean rate per spill~ 4Ee6 p/s (online estimation without proper analysis) |
Sat Mar 30 20:51:31 2024, hh, mb, ps, High statistics, 1054, TJ-Monopix2, 800 MeV, Low Flux High, Proton, Unknown, 30.03.2024 20:50:53, 30.03.2024 20:53:58, 3, HV, , 
|
automatic log for run 1054
Comment:
Litle high settings run |
|
Sat Mar 30 20:46:41 2024, hh, mb, ps, High statistics, 1053, TJ-Monopix2, 800 MeV, Low Flux High, Proton, Unknown, 30.03.2024 20:31:14, 30.03.2024 20:49:08, 17, HV, ,
|
automatic log for run 1053
Comment:
Back to stock veto period of 7us (100)
Lets try with high |
|
Sat Mar 30 20:27:35 2024, hh, mb, ps, High statistics, 1052, TJ-Monopix2, 800 MeV, Low Flux Medium, Proton, Unknown, 30.03.2024 20:17:11, 30.03.2024 20:30:02, 12, HV, ,
|
automatic log for run 1052
Comment:
Back to stock veto period of 7us (100) |
|
Sat Mar 30 20:13:29 2024, hh, mb, ps, High statistics, 1051, TJ-Monopix2, 800 MeV, Low Flux Medium, Proton, Unknown, 30.03.2024 19:48:36, 30.03.2024 20:15:55, 27, HV, ,
|
automatic log for run 1051
Comment:
Try with increased veto period of 20us (800) |
|
Sat Mar 30 19:44:43 2024, hh, mb, ps, High statistics, 1050, TJ-Monopix2, 800 MeV, Low Flux Medium, Proton, Unknown, 30.03.2024 19:40:21, 30.03.2024 19:47:10, 6, HV, ,
|
automatic log for run 1050
Comment:
Try with increased veto period of 20us (800) |
|
Sat Mar 30 19:36:57 2024, hh, mb, ps, High statistics, 1049, TJ-Monopix2, 800 MeV, Low Flux Medium, Proton, Unknown, 30.03.2024 19:28:44, 30.03.2024 19:39:24, 10, HV, ,
|
automatic log for run 1049
Comment:
Try with increased veto period of 20us (800) |
|
Sat Mar 30 19:24:57 2024, hh, mb, ps, High statistics, 1048, TJ-Monopix2, 800 MeV, Low Flux Medium, Proton, Unknown, 30.03.2024 19:02:52, 30.03.2024 19:27:24, 24, HV, ,
|
automatic log for run 1048
Comment:
Run with medium settings |
|