| ID |
Date |
Author |
Subject |
Run Number |
DUT |
Beam Energy |
Rate Setting |
Particle Type |
Events |
Data |
Beam Betatron |
Beam Chopper |
Beam Degrader |
Beam EFE |
Beam Orb |
Beam QuadScan |
PhantomType |
PhantomAngle |
|
266
|
Thu Oct 7 11:11:19 2021 |
Philipp Gaggl | Pad Sensoren | 32 | SiC+Si | 120 | | Carbon | | Unknown | | | 10 | | | | | |
beamtime on 18.09.2021
CH1: SiC
CH3: Si
Bias_Si: -100 V
Bias_SiC: 600 V |
|
267
|
Thu Oct 7 11:11:42 2021 |
Philipp Gaggl | Pad Sensoren | 33 | SiC+Si | 120 | | Carbon | | Unknown | | | 10 | | | | | |
beamtime on 18.09.2021
CH1: SiC
CH3: Si
Bias_Si: -100 V
Bias_SiC: 400 V |
|
268
|
Thu Oct 7 11:12:10 2021 |
Philipp Gaggl | Pad Sensoren | 34 | SiC+Si | 62.4 | | Proton | | Unknown | | | 10 | | | | | |
beamtime on 18.09.2021
CH1: SiC
CH3: Si
Bias_Si: -100 V
Bias_SiC: 400 V |
|
269
|
Thu Oct 7 11:12:44 2021 |
Philipp Gaggl | Pad Sensoren | 35 | SiC+Si | 62.4 | | Proton | | Unknown | | | 10 | | | | | |
beamtime on 18.09.2021
CH1: SiC
CH3: Si
Bias_Si: -100 V
Bias_SiC: 600 V |
|
270
|
Thu Oct 7 11:13:05 2021 |
Philipp Gaggl | Pad Sensoren | 36 | SiC+Si | 62.4 | | Proton | | Unknown | | | 10 | | | | | |
beamtime on 18.09.2021
CH1: SiC
CH3: Si
Bias_Si: -100 V
Bias_SiC: 800 V |
|
271
|
Thu Oct 7 11:13:21 2021 |
Philipp Gaggl | Pad Sensoren | 37 | SiC+Si | 62.4 | | Proton | | Unknown | | | 10 | | | | | |
beamtime on 18.09.2021
CH1: SiC
CH3: Si
Bias_Si: -100 V
Bias_SiC: 1100 V |
|
272
|
Thu Oct 7 11:13:46 2021 |
Philipp Gaggl | Pad Sensoren | 38 | SiC+Si | | | | | Unknown | | | | | | | | |
beamtime on 18.09.2021
CH1: SiC
CH3: Si
Bias_Si: -100 V
Bias_SiC: 1100 V
Noise measurement |
|
302
|
Sun Nov 21 13:51:53 2021 |
Simon Waid | Comparison SiC, Si, Si LGAD and Diamond | 1 | SiC+Si | 62.4 | I(EFE+SID0) | Proton | 10000 | | | | | | | | | |
Bias voltage SiC: 800
Bias voltage Si: -150
From a beam perspective the Si detector was the first target, on oscilloscope channel 1, SiC was the second target connected to oscilloscope channel 3.
Triggering source was the SiC detector.
Data was stored on the HiBPM-Osci-2 NUC under c:\measurements |
|
303
|
Sun Nov 21 13:55:05 2021 |
Simon Waid | Comparison SiC, Si, Si LGAD and Diamond | 2 | SiC+Si | 62.4 | I(EFE+SID0) | Proton | 1000000 | | | | | | | | | |
Bias voltage SiC: 800
Bias voltage Si: -150
From a beam perspective the Si detector was the first target, on oscilloscope channel 1, SiC was the second target connected to oscilloscope channel 3.
Triggering source was the Si detector.
The compliancy of the SiC SMU triggered after approx. 50% of the events had been acquired after this event the HV for the SiC HV was shut down.
Data was stored on the HiBPM-Osci-2 NUC under c:\measurements |
|
304
|
Sun Nov 21 14:05:18 2021 |
Simon Waid | Comparison SiC, Si, Si LGAD and Diamond | 3 | | 62.4 | I(EFE+SID0) | Proton | 10000 | | | | | | | | | |
Bias voltage SiC: 800
Bias voltage Si LGAD: -100
From a beam perspective the SiC detector was the first target, on oscilloscope channel 4, the Si LGAD was the second target connected to oscilloscope channel 1.
Triggering source was the Si LGAD detector. The SiC detector was most probably defective.
Data was stored on the HiBPM-Osci-2 NUC under c:\measurements |
|
305
|
Sun Nov 21 14:53:00 2021 |
Simon Waid | Comparison SiC, Si, Si LGAD and Diamond | 4 | Diamond+LGAD | 62.4 | I(EFE+SID0) | Proton | 100000 | | | | | | | | | |
Bias voltage Diamond: 500
Bias voltage Si LGAD: -100
From a beam perspective the Diamond detector was the first target, on oscilloscope channel 4, the Si LGAD was the second target connected to oscilloscope channel 1.
Triggering source was the Si LGAD detector.
Data was stored on the HiBPM-Osci-2 NUC under c:\measurements |